ABTC
Price
$7.76
Change
+$0.36 (+4.86%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
HUT
Price
$25.76
Change
+$0.38 (+1.50%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABTC vs HUT

Header iconABTC vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts ABTC vs HUTBanner chart's image
American Bitcoin
Price$7.76
Change+$0.36 (+4.86%)
Volume$38.14K
CapitalizationN/A
Hut 8
Price$25.76
Change+$0.38 (+1.50%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization2.68B
ABTC vs HUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABTC vs. HUT commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTC is a Hold and HUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ABTC: $7.40 vs. HUT: $25.38)
Brand notoriety: ABTC and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABTC: 114% vs. HUT: 103%
Market capitalization -- ABTC: $0 vs. HUT: $2.68B
ABTC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $0. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABTC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than ABTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABTC is a better buy in the short-term than HUT.

Price Growth

ABTC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +380.52% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +12.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+12.26% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABTC YTD gains are higher at: 1746.768 vs. HUT (23.865).
ABTCHUTABTC / HUT
CapitalizationN/A2.68B-
EBITDAN/A367M-
Gain YTD1746.76823.8657,319%
P/E RatioN/A17.75-
RevenueN/A550M-
Total CashN/A216M-
Total DebtN/A362M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABTC vs HUT: Fundamental Ratings
ABTC
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
10053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3526

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABTC's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUT (82). This means that ABTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as ABTC (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to ABTC’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABTC (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABTC’s over the last 12 months.

ABTC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (36). This means that ABTC’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABTC (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew significantly faster than ABTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABTCHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEITX16.070.11
+0.69%
VELA International I
MRSJX26.000.11
+0.42%
MFS Research International R4
PIGRX16.900.03
+0.18%
Putnam International Value C
CGCIX14.150.01
+0.07%
Calamos Global Opportunities I
MSFLX34.06-0.16
-0.47%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise L

ABTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABTC and HUT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABTC and HUT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABTC
1D Price
Change %
ABTC100%
+15.44%
HUT - ABTC
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
GREE - ABTC
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.42%
ANY - ABTC
27%
Poorly correlated
+11.42%
BTBT - ABTC
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
MC - ABTC
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More