Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs AMHIX
ABTFX vs AMHIX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs AMHIX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$10.34
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.78B
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$15.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13B
ABTFX vs AMHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. AMHIX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and AMHIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. ABTFX (2.78B). AMHIX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: AMHIX (4.01) vs ABTFX (3.44). ABTFX was incepted earlier than AMHIX: ABTFX (16 years) vs AMHIX (31 years). ABTFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than AMHIX (0.66). AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ABTFX (24.00). AMHIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTFX: AMHIX (250) vs ABTFX (2500). ABTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.19 vs. AMHIX (-0.63). ABTFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.51 vs. AMHIX (-3.36).
| ABTFX | AMHIX | ABTFX / AMHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.66 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.66 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.580 | 0.589 | 438% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 13B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 4.01 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.19 | -0.63 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.05 | 9.94 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.51 | -3.36 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.09 | 4.09 | 394% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement