Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs GGLPX
ABTFX vs GGLPX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs GGLPX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$10.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
Goldman Sachs High Yield Muni P
Price$9.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.64B
ABTFX vs GGLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. GGLPX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and GGLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGLPX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. ABTFX (2.77B). GGLPX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: GGLPX (4.75) vs ABTFX (3.20). ABTFX was incepted earlier than GGLPX: ABTFX (16 years) vs GGLPX (7 years). ABTFX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GGLPX (0.55). ABTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. GGLPX (18.00). GGLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTFX: GGLPX (0) vs ABTFX (2500). GGLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.03 vs. ABTFX (-1.46). GGLPX return over 5 years is better than : 8.63 vs. ABTFX (2.00).
| ABTFX | GGLPX | ABTFX / GGLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.52 | 375% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.55 | 356% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.210 | 0.592 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 12.6B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 4.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.46 | 0.03 | -4,312% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.62 | 15.12 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.00 | 8.63 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers