ABVN
Price
$0.59
Change
-$0.01 (-1.67%)
Updated
Mar 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.92M
AMLTF
Price
$0.94
Change
+$0.07 (+8.05%)
Updated
Oct 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
Ad is loading...

ABVN vs AMLTF

Header iconABVN vs AMLTF Comparison
Open Charts ABVN vs AMLTFBanner chart's image
ABV Consulting
Price$0.59
Change-$0.01 (-1.67%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.92M
AMP
Price$0.94
Change+$0.07 (+8.05%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.89B
ABVN vs AMLTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABVN vs. AMLTF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABVN is a Hold and AMLTF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ABVN: $0.59 vs. AMLTF: $0.94)
Brand notoriety: ABVN and AMLTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABVN: 1% vs. AMLTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ABVN: $2.92M vs. AMLTF: $1.89B
ABVN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.92M. AMLTF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABVN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAMLTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABVN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • AMLTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMLTF is a better buy in the long-term than ABVN.

Price Growth

ABVN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while AMLTF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.79% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMLTF($1.89B) has a higher market cap than ABVN($2.92M). AMLTF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. ABVN (-1.667). AMLTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.92B vs. ABVN (-35.39K). AMLTF has more cash in the bank: 7.18B vs. ABVN (4.14K). ABVN has less debt than AMLTF: ABVN (47.5K) vs AMLTF (28.7B). AMLTF has higher revenues than ABVN: AMLTF (856M) vs ABVN (0).
ABVNAMLTFABVN / AMLTF
Capitalization2.92M1.89B0%
EBITDA-35.39K1.92B-0%
Gain YTD-1.6670.000-
P/E RatioN/A57.51-
Revenue0856M-
Total Cash4.14K7.18B0%
Total Debt47.5K28.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABVN vs AMLTF: Fundamental Ratings
ABVN
AMLTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9938
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
10020
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMLTF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as ABVN (40). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew similarly to ABVN’s over the last 12 months.

ABVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLTF (100). This means that ABVN’s stock grew similarly to AMLTF’s over the last 12 months.

AMLTF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABVN (100). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew significantly faster than ABVN’s over the last 12 months.

ABVN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLTF (45). This means that ABVN’s stock grew similarly to AMLTF’s over the last 12 months.

AMLTF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as ABVN (100). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew similarly to ABVN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEYRX31.36N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Growth R
VADDX72.41N/A
N/A
Invesco Equally-Wtd S&P 500 Y
EAPDX15.91N/A
N/A
Parametric Dividend Income A
KTRZX8.72N/A
N/A
DWS Global Income Builder R6
FIFNX21.81N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Founders

ABVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABVN and IWSH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABVN and IWSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABVN
1D Price
Change %
ABVN100%
N/A
IWSH - ABVN
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCUF - ABVN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLACU - ABVN
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRAC - ABVN
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - ABVN
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More

AMLTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMLTF and BFACF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMLTF and BFACF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMLTF
1D Price
Change %
AMLTF100%
N/A
BFACF - AMLTF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
AASP - AMLTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
BQST - AMLTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACBD - AMLTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABVN - AMLTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More