ABVN
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.10 (-9.09%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
105.53M
GRAF
Price
$10.56
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
303.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABVN vs GRAF

Header iconABVN vs GRAF Comparison
Open Charts ABVN vs GRAFBanner chart's image
ABV Consulting
Price$1.00
Change-$0.10 (-9.09%)
Volume$100
Capitalization105.53M
Graf Global
Price$10.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization303.6M
ABVN vs GRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABVN vs. GRAF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABVN is a Hold and GRAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ABVN: $1.00 vs. GRAF: $10.56)
Brand notoriety: ABVN and GRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABVN: 12% vs. GRAF: 17%
Market capitalization -- ABVN: $105.53M vs. GRAF: $303.6M
ABVN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $105.53M. GRAF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $303.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABVN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABVN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABVN is a better buy in the long-term than GRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABVN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABVN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GRAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRAF is a better buy in the short-term than ABVN.

Price Growth

ABVN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRAF($304M) has a higher market cap than ABVN($106M). ABVN YTD gains are higher at: 66.667 vs. GRAF (4.658).
ABVNGRAFABVN / GRAF
Capitalization106M304M35%
EBITDAN/A-880.41K-
Gain YTD66.6674.6581,431%
P/E RatioN/A22.96-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A107K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABVN: Fundamental Ratings
ABVN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABVNGRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
2%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWGL5.24N/A
N/A
Crimson Wine Group Ltd.
FQVTF11.87N/A
N/A
Fevertree Drinks Plc
IFUUF5.40N/A
N/A
Infrastructure & Utilities NZ Ltd.
CRARF19.07-0.19
-0.99%
Credit Agricole SA
NATBF0.23-0.01
-3.31%
NATBRIDGE RES LTD

ABVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABVN and IWSH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABVN and IWSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABVN
1D Price
Change %
ABVN100%
-9.09%
IWSH - ABVN
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCUF - ABVN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - ABVN
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
AASP - ABVN
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACBD - ABVN
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRAF has been loosely correlated with CUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRAF jumps, then CUB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAF
1D Price
Change %
GRAF100%
-0.19%
CUB - GRAF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AACI - GRAF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
ALF - GRAF
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
TRTLF - GRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAM - GRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More