ABVN
Price
$0.59
Change
-$0.01 (-1.67%)
Updated
Mar 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.92M
VMCUF
Price
$10.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

ABVN vs VMCUF

Header iconABVN vs VMCUF Comparison
Open Charts ABVN vs VMCUFBanner chart's image
ABV Consulting
Price$0.59
Change-$0.01 (-1.67%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.92M
Valuence Merger Corp I
Price$10.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.15K
CapitalizationN/A
ABVN vs VMCUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABVN vs. VMCUF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABVN is a Hold and VMCUF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ABVN: $0.59 vs. VMCUF: $10.81)
Brand notoriety: ABVN and VMCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABVN: 1% vs. VMCUF: 207%
Market capitalization -- ABVN: $2.92M vs. VMCUF: $0
ABVN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.92M. VMCUF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABVN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVMCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABVN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VMCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABVN is a better buy in the long-term than VMCUF.

Price Growth

ABVN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VMCUF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.83% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABVN YTD gains are higher at: -1.667 vs. VMCUF (-5.507). ABVN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -35.39K vs. VMCUF (-1.39M). VMCUF has more cash in the bank: 685K vs. ABVN (4.14K). ABVN has less debt than VMCUF: ABVN (47.5K) vs VMCUF (2.26M). ABVN (0) and VMCUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ABVNVMCUFABVN / VMCUF
Capitalization2.92MN/A-
EBITDA-35.39K-1.39M3%
Gain YTD-1.667-5.50730%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.14K685K1%
Total Debt47.5K2.26M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABVN: Fundamental Ratings
ABVN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIRGX38.55N/A
N/A
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R2
WLCGX48.08N/A
N/A
Wilshire Large Company Growth Instl
HFYFX11.03N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val F
RMMTX16.64N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Emerging Markets M
LYFCX12.52N/A
N/A
AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare C

ABVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABVN and IWSH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABVN and IWSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABVN
1D Price
Change %
ABVN100%
N/A
IWSH - ABVN
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCUF - ABVN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLACU - ABVN
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRAC - ABVN
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - ABVN
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

VMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VMCUF has been loosely correlated with MTLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VMCUF jumps, then MTLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMCUF
1D Price
Change %
VMCUF100%
N/A
MTLK - VMCUF
37%
Loosely correlated
-36.56%
ABVN - VMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKUU - VMCUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFAR - VMCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLRCU - VMCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More