Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYAX vs LFMCX
ABYAX vs LFMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYAX vs. LFMCX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYAX is a Hold and LFMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYAX has more cash in the bank: 2.45B vs. LFMCX (1.54B). LFMCX pays higher dividends than ABYAX: LFMCX (2.27) vs ABYAX (1.78). ABYAX was incepted earlier than LFMCX: ABYAX (11 years) vs LFMCX (14 years). LFMCX (2.88) is less costly to investors than ABYAX (2.10). LFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. ABYAX (0.00). ABYAX (2500) and LFMCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LFMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.74 vs. ABYAX (-10.63). ABYAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.62 vs. LFMCX (0.80).
| ABYAX | LFMCX | ABYAX / LFMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.88 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.88 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.383 | -1.253 | 429% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 1.54B | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.27 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.63 | -4.74 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.83 | -14.83 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.62 | 0.80 | 1,074% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.80 | 5.70 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers