Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYAX vs LFMCX
ABYAX vs LFMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYAX vs. LFMCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYAX is a Hold and LFMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYAX has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. LFMCX (1.53B). LFMCX pays higher dividends than ABYAX: LFMCX (2.27) vs ABYAX (1.76). ABYAX was incepted earlier than LFMCX: ABYAX (11 years) vs LFMCX (14 years). LFMCX (2.88) is less costly to investors than ABYAX (2.10). LFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. ABYAX (0.00). ABYAX (2500) and LFMCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LFMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.01 vs. ABYAX (-4.05). ABYAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.41 vs. LFMCX (-1.26).
| ABYAX | LFMCX | ABYAX / LFMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.88 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.88 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.923 | -0.418 | 939% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 1.53B | 153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.27 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.05 | 0.01 | -46,488% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.34 | -14.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.41 | -1.26 | -746% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.43 | 2.28 | 326% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement