Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYCX vs AMFNX
ABYCX vs AMFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYCX vs. AMFNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYCX is a Hold and AMFNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYCX has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. AMFNX (1.26B). AMFNX pays higher dividends than ABYCX: AMFNX (1.85) vs ABYCX (0.97). ABYCX was incepted earlier than AMFNX: ABYCX (10 years) vs AMFNX (8 years). ABYCX (2.85) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.44). ABYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMFNX: ABYCX (2500) vs AMFNX (2500000). ABYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.49 vs. AMFNX (-16.77). ABYCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.22 vs. AMFNX (-10.95).
| ABYCX | AMFNX | ABYCX / AMFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 1.33 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 1.44 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.468 | -15.789 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 1.26B | 185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.85 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.49 | -16.77 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.20 | -41.30 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.22 | -10.95 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |