Ad is loading...
ABYCX vs AMFNX
ABYCX vs AMFNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYCX vs. AMFNX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYCX is a Hold and AMFNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYCX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. AMFNX (1.46B). AMFNX pays higher dividends than ABYCX: AMFNX (1.67) vs ABYCX (0.94). ABYCX was incepted earlier than AMFNX: ABYCX (10 years) vs AMFNX (8 years). ABYCX (2.85) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.33). ABYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMFNX: ABYCX (2500) vs AMFNX (1000000). ABYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.87 vs. AMFNX (-26.74). ABYCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.41 vs. AMFNX (-10.87).
| ABYCX | AMFNX | ABYCX / AMFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 1.33 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 1.33 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.468 | -16.133 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 1.46B | 170% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.67 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.87 | -26.74 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.17 | -37.78 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.41 | -10.87 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...