Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYCX vs GPMFX
ABYCX vs GPMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYCX vs. GPMFX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYCX is a Hold and GPMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYCX has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. GPMFX (253M). ABYCX pays higher dividends than GPMFX: ABYCX (0.98) vs GPMFX (0.02). ABYCX was incepted earlier than GPMFX: ABYCX (10 years) vs GPMFX (10 years). ABYCX (2.85) is less costly to investors than GPMFX (1.51). ABYCX (0.00) and GPMFX (0.00) have comparable annual turnover. GPMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABYCX: GPMFX (0) vs ABYCX (2500). ABYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.95 vs. GPMFX (-17.03). ABYCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.34 vs. GPMFX (-17.61).
| ABYCX | GPMFX | ABYCX / GPMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 1.51 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 1.51 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.464 | -17.886 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 253M | 928% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.02 | 5,276% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.95 | -17.03 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.35 | -34.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.34 | -17.61 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement