Ad is loading...
ABYCX vs GPMFX
ABYCX vs GPMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYCX vs. GPMFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYCX is a Hold and GPMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYCX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. GPMFX (218M). ABYCX pays higher dividends than GPMFX: ABYCX (0.94) vs GPMFX (0.02). ABYCX was incepted earlier than GPMFX: ABYCX (10 years) vs GPMFX (9 years). ABYCX (2.85) is less costly to investors than GPMFX (1.51). ABYCX (0.00) and GPMFX (0.00) have comparable annual turnover. GPMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABYCX: GPMFX (0) vs ABYCX (2500). ABYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.87 vs. GPMFX (-26.84). ABYCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.41 vs. GPMFX (-13.70).
| ABYCX | GPMFX | ABYCX / GPMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 1.51 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 1.51 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.468 | -16.006 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 218M | 1,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.02 | 5,733% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.87 | -26.84 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.17 | -33.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.41 | -13.70 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...