Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYCX vs LFMCX
ABYCX vs LFMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYCX vs. LFMCX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYCX is a Hold and LFMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYCX has more cash in the bank: 2.45B vs. LFMCX (1.54B). LFMCX pays higher dividends than ABYCX: LFMCX (2.27) vs ABYCX (0.98). ABYCX was incepted earlier than LFMCX: ABYCX (10 years) vs LFMCX (14 years). LFMCX (2.88) and ABYCX (2.85) have similar cost to investors . LFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. ABYCX (0.00). ABYCX (2500) and LFMCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LFMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.74 vs. ABYCX (-11.33). ABYCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.42 vs. LFMCX (0.80).
| ABYCX | LFMCX | ABYCX / LFMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 2.88 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 2.88 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.798 | -1.253 | 463% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 1.54B | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 2.27 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.33 | -4.74 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.85 | -14.83 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.42 | 0.80 | 550% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement