Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYCX vs LFMCX
ABYCX vs LFMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYCX vs. LFMCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYCX is a Hold and LFMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYCX has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. LFMCX (1.53B). LFMCX pays higher dividends than ABYCX: LFMCX (2.27) vs ABYCX (0.97). ABYCX was incepted earlier than LFMCX: ABYCX (10 years) vs LFMCX (14 years). LFMCX (2.88) and ABYCX (2.85) have similar cost to investors . LFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. ABYCX (0.00). ABYCX (2500) and LFMCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LFMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.01 vs. ABYCX (-4.76). ABYCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.22 vs. LFMCX (-1.26).
| ABYCX | LFMCX | ABYCX / LFMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 2.88 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 2.88 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.468 | -0.418 | 1,069% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 1.53B | 153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 2.27 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | 0.01 | -54,625% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.38 | -14.21 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.22 | -1.26 | -413% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement