ACA
Price
$145.20
Change
-$0.03 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
7.09B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ALG
Price
$159.08
Change
+$1.24 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACA vs ALG

ACA vs ALG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs. Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Arcosa (ACA) delivered record full-year 2025 results with revenue of $2.88 billion and Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) of $583 million, reflecting a 30% year-over-year EBITDA expansion driven by strategic portfolio transformation.
  • Alamo Group (ALG) posted mixed 2025 performance, with its Industrial Equipment division growing 12.6% while the Vegetation Management division contracted 16.7%, underscoring divergent segment momentum within a single enterprise.
  • ACA's recent agreement to divest its barge business for $450 million signals a sharpened focus on higher-margin construction materials and engineered structures; ALG is navigating a manufacturing footprint restructuring while integrating two new acquisitions.
  • ACA has significantly outperformed ALG on a one-year total return basis — rising approximately 65% versus ALG's decline of roughly 27% — reflecting contrasting market sentiment and earnings trajectories.
  • Both companies carry strong balance sheets, but ALG's net cash position (cash exceeding total debt) and 0.80% dividend yield present a different risk-reward profile compared to ACA's growth-oriented, lower-yield equity.

Introduction

Investors evaluating industrial and infrastructure-related equities often encounter two distinct yet overlapping names: ACA (Arcosa, Inc.) and ALG (Alamo Group Inc.). Both are Texas-headquartered manufacturers serving infrastructure and industrial end markets, yet their recent trajectories, business mixes, and market responses have diverged considerably. Arcosa has emerged as a high-growth infrastructure pure-play benefiting from U.S. grid modernization and construction tailwinds. Alamo Group offers a broader industrial and vegetation management portfolio but has faced headwinds in its agricultural and tree-care segments. This comparison explores how these two companies stack up across growth dynamics, risk exposure, and market positioning — providing a useful framework for investors weighing exposure to the industrials sector.

ACA Overview and Recent Performance

ACA, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is a provider of infrastructure-related products and solutions operating through three segments: Construction Products, Engineered Structures, and Transportation Products. The company has undergone a notable portfolio transformation since its 2018 spin-off, culminating in the transformative $1.2 billion acquisition of Stavola, an aggregates-led construction materials company, in late 2024.

In recent quarters, Arcosa has posted a series of record results. Full-year 2025 revenue reached $2.88 billion, up 12% year-over-year, while Adjusted EBITDA climbed 30% to $583 million, with margins expanding 280 basis points to 20.2%. The Engineered Structures segment has been a standout, benefiting from robust demand for utility structures tied to grid modernization and renewable energy buildout. Utility structures backlog stood at approximately $435 million at year-end 2025, providing solid visibility into 2026. The Construction Products segment, anchored by the accretive Stavola acquisition, delivered strong aggregates pricing growth and margin expansion throughout the year.

A pivotal recent development was the February 2026 announcement of the $450 million sale of Arcosa's barge business to Wynnchurch Capital. This divestiture, expected to close in the second quarter of 2026, marks a strategic pivot toward higher-margin, lower-cyclicality growth businesses. For 2026, management guided to revenue of $2.95–$3.10 billion and Adjusted EBITDA of $590–$640 million. The stock has reflected this momentum, trading near $145 with a year-to-date gain exceeding 36% and a one-year total return of roughly 65%.

ALG Overview and Recent Performance

ALG, based in Seguin, Texas, designs, manufactures, and services high-quality equipment for vegetation management and infrastructure maintenance. The company operates two divisions: the Industrial Equipment Division — encompassing vacuum trucks, street sweepers, snow removal equipment, and excavators — and the Vegetation Management Division, which produces mowers, forestry tools, agricultural implements, and related aftermarket parts.

Alamo Group's recent performance has been bifurcated. Full-year 2025 net sales declined 1.5% to $1.60 billion, while Adjusted EBITDA eased to $216.9 million (13.5% margin) from $228.4 million (14.0%) in 2024. The Industrial Equipment Division delivered robust 12.6% revenue growth, fueled by strong demand from governmental agencies and specialty contractors, particularly for vacuum trucks and snow removal equipment. However, the Vegetation Management Division saw revenues contract 16.7%, pressured by weak end-market demand in tree care, agriculture, and municipal mowing — conditions amplified by low crop prices and elevated interest rates.

Management has undertaken significant restructuring, including manufacturing facility consolidations aimed at reducing fixed costs. While these actions caused near-term margin compression — the Vegetation Management Division's Q4 2025 Adjusted EBITDA margin fell to just 2.3% — the company expects operational gains to materialize as consolidations near completion. Alamo also strengthened its portfolio through acquisitions, including Ring-O-Matic in mid-2025 and Petersen Industries, which closed in January 2026. The company's balance sheet remains a source of resilience, with cash of $309.7 million exceeding total debt of $205.7 million. ALG currently trades near $157, down roughly 27% over the past year, with a P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratio of approximately 19 and a dividend yield of about 0.80%.

Trending AI Robots

In an era where algorithmic and AI-driven decision-making increasingly shapes financial markets, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders a curated view of the platform's most compelling virtual trading agents. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively scan thousands of tickers across multiple timeframes — from 5-minute intraday models to 60-minute swing-trading strategies — yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in the Trending section. These bots employ Financial Learning Models (FLMs) that continuously adapt to shifting volatility, trend strength, and price action, with some agents posting annualized returns exceeding 70% and win rates above 65% in recent reporting periods. Each robot features a distinct trading style — spanning long-only, short-selling, and hedged approaches — along with transparent statistics including profit factors, Sharpe ratios, and drawdown metrics. For traders seeking to complement their own analysis with AI-generated signals, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can serve as a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although both ACA and ALG operate in the broad industrial and infrastructure space, their structural differences are significant and increasingly pronounced.

Business Model and End-Market Exposure: ACA is heavily concentrated in U.S. infrastructure — construction aggregates, utility poles, wind towers, and traffic structures — serving secular demand drivers including grid hardening, renewable energy deployment, and federal infrastructure spending. ALG's portfolio is more diversified but also more cyclical at the margin: its Industrial Equipment division benefits from municipal and contractor spending, while the Vegetation Management division is sensitive to agricultural commodity cycles, housing starts, and landscaping demand.

Growth and Momentum: ACA's revenue grew 16% in 2025 (adjusting for divestitures), with all three segments contributing. ALG's top line was essentially flat, with strong industrial growth fully offset by vegetation management weakness. ACA's record backlog across utility structures and wind towers points to sustained momentum; ALG's backlog of $687 million is healthy but its Vegetation Management division continues to face demand uncertainty.

Margin Profiles: ACA's 20.2% Adjusted EBITDA margin reflects the accretive impact of the Stavola acquisition and operating leverage in Engineered Structures. ALG's 13.5% margin, while respectable, reflects the drag from its underperforming Vegetation Management division. As facility consolidations conclude, ALG anticipates margin recovery, but the timeline remains uncertain.

Risk Factors: ACA faces integration risk from its portfolio reshaping and near-term wind tower volume softness in 2026. Tariff exposure exists but management characterizes it as immaterial. ALG contends with lingering agricultural weakness, tariff-driven cost pressures (estimated at slightly less than 1% of sales in 2026), and execution risk tied to its restructuring initiatives.

Capital Allocation: ACA is prioritizing deleveraging and bolt-on acquisitions within construction materials and engineered structures. ALG, with a net cash position, is actively pursuing tuck-in M&A (Mergers and Acquisitions) while returning capital to shareholders through a recently increased $0.34 quarterly dividend — a 13.3% raise.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative sector positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor ACA in the current market environment. The stock's persistent uptrend, record-level revenue and EBITDA generation, expanding margins, and alignment with multi-year infrastructure and electrification tailwinds create a favorable signal profile that trend-following and momentum-oriented AI models tend to recognize. The barge divestiture further simplifies the investment thesis, concentrating exposure on higher-growth, higher-margin segments. In contrast, while ALG offers value characteristics — a lower P/E multiple, a net cash balance sheet, and a growing dividend — its mixed divisional performance and ongoing restructuring introduce a degree of uncertainty that probabilistic AI models would typically discount. This assessment is not a prediction of future prices but rather a reflection of the relative strength and clarity of each stock's current quantitative and fundamental profile.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ACA vs. ALG commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACA is a StrongBuy and ALG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ACA: $145.20 vs. ALG: $159.08)
Brand notoriety: ACA and ALG are both not notable
ACA represents the Engineering & Construction, while ALG is part of the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACA: 76% vs. ALG: 69%
Market capitalization -- ACA: $7.09B vs. ALG: $1.94B
ACA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $7.09B. ALG’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $375.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.08B. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $27.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileALG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ALG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACA is a better buy in the long-term than ALG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ALG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ALG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ACA and ALG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ACA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while ALG (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -3.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -4.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.76%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACA is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

ALG is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-4.32% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-3.97% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACA($7.09B) has a higher market cap than ALG($1.94B). ACA has higher P/E ratio than ALG: ACA (32.48) vs ALG (19.03). ACA YTD gains are higher at: 36.737 vs. ALG (-4.686). ACA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 581M vs. ALG (210M). ALG has less debt than ACA: ALG (290M) vs ACA (1.52B). ACA has higher revenues than ALG: ACA (2.91B) vs ALG (1.63B).
ACAALGACA / ALG
Capitalization7.09B1.94B366%
EBITDA581M210M277%
Gain YTD36.737-4.686-784%
P/E Ratio32.4819.03171%
Revenue2.91B1.63B178%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.52B290M524%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACA vs ALG: Fundamental Ratings
ACA
ALG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2090
SMR RATING
1..100
7676
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4071
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALG's Valuation (24) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACA (73). This means that ALG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACA’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALG (90). This means that ACA’s stock grew significantly faster than ALG’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's SMR Rating (76) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as ALG (76). This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to ALG’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as ALG (71). This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to ALG’s over the last 12 months.

ALG's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as ACA (90). This means that ALG’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACAALG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ALG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYZD22.540.03
+0.15%
WisdomTree Interest Rt Hdg Hi Yld Bd ETF
TRSY30.19N/A
N/A
Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF
MAGO22.70N/A
N/A
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
NUSA23.06-0.02
-0.09%
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year US Aggt Bd ETF
IGEB44.29-0.06
-0.14%
iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF

ACA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACA has been loosely correlated with ALG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACA jumps, then ALG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACA
1D Price
Change %
ACA100%
-0.02%
ALG - ACA
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
TPC - ACA
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
GVA - ACA
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.26%
TEX - ACA
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
ROAD - ACA
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More

ALG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALG has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALG jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALG
1D Price
Change %
ALG100%
+0.79%
ACA - ALG
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
OSK - ALG
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
CNH - ALG
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
AGCO - ALG
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.64%
DE - ALG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
More