ACA
Price
$85.21
Change
-$2.14 (-2.45%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.26B
70 days until earnings call
BIRDF
Price
$18.92
Change
+$0.29 (+1.56%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACA vs BIRDF

Header iconACA vs BIRDF Comparison
Open Charts ACA vs BIRDFBanner chart's image
Arcosa
Price$85.21
Change-$2.14 (-2.45%)
Volume$147.08K
Capitalization4.26B
Bird Construction
Price$18.92
Change+$0.29 (+1.56%)
Volume$1.73K
Capitalization1.04B
ACA vs BIRDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ACA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACA vs. BIRDF commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACA is a Buy and BIRDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (ACA: $85.21 vs. BIRDF: $18.92)
Brand notoriety: ACA and BIRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACA: 47% vs. BIRDF: 65%
Market capitalization -- ACA: $4.26B vs. BIRDF: $1.04B
ACA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $4.26B. BIRDF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $1.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBIRDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BIRDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BIRDF is a better buy in the long-term than ACA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ACA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ACA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -3.78% price change this week, while BIRDF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.64% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACA($4.26B) has a higher market cap than BIRDF($1.04B). ACA has higher P/E ratio than BIRDF: ACA (53.59) vs BIRDF (14.51). BIRDF YTD gains are higher at: 4.683 vs. ACA (-11.816). ACA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 409M vs. BIRDF (214M). ACA has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. BIRDF (44.6M). BIRDF has less debt than ACA: BIRDF (261M) vs ACA (1.69B). BIRDF has higher revenues than ACA: BIRDF (3.4B) vs ACA (2.6B).
ACABIRDFACA / BIRDF
Capitalization4.26B1.04B411%
EBITDA409M214M191%
Gain YTD-11.8164.683-252%
P/E Ratio53.5914.51369%
Revenue2.6B3.4B77%
Total Cash168M44.6M377%
Total Debt1.69B261M646%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACA vs BIRDF: Fundamental Ratings
ACA
BIRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3527
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1153
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
475

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BIRDF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACA (88) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that BIRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACA’s over the last 12 months.

BIRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as ACA (35) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that BIRDF’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

BIRDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACA (100) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that BIRDF’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

BIRDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ACA (57) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that BIRDF’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIRDF (53) in the null industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMAOX11.63N/A
N/A
GMO Quality Cyclicals I
FTIEX13.08N/A
N/A
Fidelity Total International Equity
PINTX10.78N/A
N/A
Principal Overseas R3
CCQYX14.73N/A
N/A
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst3
WCEIX10.95N/A
N/A
Virtus Westchester Event-Driven Fd I

BIRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BIRDF and PWR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIRDF and PWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIRDF
1D Price
Change %
BIRDF100%
+1.59%
PWR - BIRDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
ACA - BIRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
STRL - BIRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
BLD - BIRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.91%
APG - BIRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More