ACA vs DBAW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACA is a Sell and DBAW is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- ACA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ACA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.10% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+0.30% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
ACA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ACA | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 13 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 60% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| APRJ | 24.83 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Apr | |||
| HYEM | 19.56 | -0.09 | -0.46% |
| VanEck EM High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| JETU | 27.46 | -0.20 | -0.72% |
| MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN | |||
| KOMP | 51.32 | -0.44 | -0.85% |
| SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Comps ETF | |||
| HDUS | 57.02 | -0.70 | -1.21% |
| Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF | |||
DBAW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBAW has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBAW jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBAW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAW | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| BN - DBAW | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| STM - DBAW | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.18% | ||
| ACA - DBAW | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| BAM - DBAW | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| MFC - DBAW | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||