ACAZF
Price
$12.91
Change
-$0.06 (-0.46%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
232.74M
IFSPF
Price
$9.81
Change
+$0.33 (+3.48%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
475.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACAZF vs IFSPF

Header iconACAZF vs IFSPF Comparison
Open Charts ACAZF vs IFSPFBanner chart's image
Acadian Timber
Price$12.91
Change-$0.06 (-0.46%)
Volume$779
Capitalization232.74M
Interfor
Price$9.81
Change+$0.33 (+3.48%)
Volume$31.27K
Capitalization475.16M
ACAZF vs IFSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACAZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACAZF vs. IFSPF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACAZF is a Hold and IFSPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ACAZF: $12.87 vs. IFSPF: $9.29)
Brand notoriety: ACAZF and IFSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACAZF: 24% vs. IFSPF: 18%
Market capitalization -- ACAZF: $232.74M vs. IFSPF: $475.16M
ACAZF [@Forest Products] is valued at $232.74M. IFSPF’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $475.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $8.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACAZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFSPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACAZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFSPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACAZF is a better buy in the long-term than IFSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACAZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFSPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACAZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • IFSPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFSPF is a better buy in the short-term than ACAZF.

Price Growth

ACAZF (@Forest Products) experienced а -1.18% price change this week, while IFSPF (@Forest Products) price change was +2.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-0.05% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFSPF($475M) has a higher market cap than ACAZF($233M). ACAZF YTD gains are higher at: 6.269 vs. IFSPF (-15.938). IFSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.7M vs. ACAZF (24M). IFSPF has more cash in the bank: 16.3M vs. ACAZF (2.65M). ACAZF has less debt than IFSPF: ACAZF (111M) vs IFSPF (856M). IFSPF has higher revenues than ACAZF: IFSPF (2.96B) vs ACAZF (88.1M).
ACAZFIFSPFACAZF / IFSPF
Capitalization233M475M49%
EBITDA24M62.7M38%
Gain YTD6.269-15.938-39%
P/E Ratio22.86N/A-
Revenue88.1M2.96B3%
Total Cash2.65M16.3M16%
Total Debt111M856M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACAZF vs IFSPF: Fundamental Ratings
ACAZF
IFSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
8694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACAZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFSPF (51). This means that ACAZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.

ACAZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as IFSPF (100). This means that ACAZF’s stock grew similarly to IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.

ACAZF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as IFSPF (94). This means that ACAZF’s stock grew similarly to IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.

ACAZF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as IFSPF (62). This means that ACAZF’s stock grew similarly to IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.

IFSPF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ACAZF (7). This means that IFSPF’s stock grew similarly to ACAZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACAZFIFSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACAZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHAYX44.750.23
+0.52%
VanEck Global Resources Fund Y
GSMYX23.98N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Instl
ASCRX16.11N/A
N/A
American Century Small Company R
JIGHX33.36N/A
N/A
JHancock International Growth NAV
MSHPX15.43N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6

ACAZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACAZF has been loosely correlated with WFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACAZF jumps, then WFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACAZF
1D Price
Change %
ACAZF100%
-0.41%
WFG - ACAZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
UFPI - ACAZF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
SSD - ACAZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
IFSPF - ACAZF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
CFPZF - ACAZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More

IFSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFSPF has been loosely correlated with CFPZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFSPF jumps, then CFPZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFSPF
1D Price
Change %
IFSPF100%
+3.44%
CFPZF - IFSPF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
WFG - IFSPF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
UFPI - IFSPF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
ACAZF - IFSPF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
SSD - IFSPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More