Advertisement
ACB vs COSM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACB is a Hold and COSM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- COSM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COSM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- COSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACB (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +14.75% price change this week, while COSM (@Medical Distributors) price change was +1.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.25%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.11%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACB is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+3.83% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
@Medical Distributors (-0.84% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
| ACB | COSM | ACB / COSM | |
| Capitalization | 320M | 34.4M | 930% |
| EBITDA | 26.6M | -12.84M | -207% |
| Gain YTD | 33.647 | 65.919 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.44 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 358M | 55.1M | 650% |
| Total Cash | 140M | 686K | 20,408% |
| Total Debt | 102M | 15.6M | 654% |
ACB | COSM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACB's Valuation (59) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as COSM (78) in the null industry. This means that ACB’s stock grew similarly to COSM’s over the last 12 months.
ACB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as COSM (100) in the null industry. This means that ACB’s stock grew similarly to COSM’s over the last 12 months.
ACB's SMR Rating (93) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as COSM (98) in the null industry. This means that ACB’s stock grew similarly to COSM’s over the last 12 months.
COSM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ACB (44) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that COSM’s stock grew similarly to ACB’s over the last 12 months.
COSM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACB (91) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that COSM’s stock grew significantly faster than ACB’s over the last 12 months.
| ACB | COSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 79% | 12 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
ACB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACB has been loosely correlated with SNDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACB jumps, then SNDL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACB | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| SNDL - ACB | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| OGI - ACB | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| CGC - ACB | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| CRON - ACB | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| TLRY - ACB | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.72% | ||
More | ||||
COSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that COSM and YI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COSM and YI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSM | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| YI - COSM | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| SUPN - COSM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| OGI - COSM | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| INCR - COSM | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
| ACB - COSM | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||