ACDC
Price
$3.71
Change
-$0.16 (-4.13%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
699.97M
50 days until earnings call
PSYTF
Price
$8.67
Change
+$0.07 (+0.81%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
676.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACDC vs PSYTF

Header iconACDC vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts ACDC vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
ProFrac Holding
Price$3.71
Change-$0.16 (-4.13%)
Volume$19.24K
Capitalization699.97M
Pason Systems
Price$8.67
Change+$0.07 (+0.81%)
Volume$19.41K
Capitalization676.54M
ACDC vs PSYTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACDC vs. PSYTF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACDC is a Hold and PSYTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ACDC: $3.71 vs. PSYTF: $8.64)
Brand notoriety: ACDC and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACDC: 100% vs. PSYTF: 24%
Market capitalization -- ACDC: $699.97M vs. PSYTF: $676.54M
ACDC [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $699.97M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $676.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $51.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACDC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACDC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than ACDC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACDC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSYTF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACDC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the short-term than ACDC.

Price Growth

ACDC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -4.38% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACDC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.31% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACDC($700M) and PSYTF($677M) have the same market capitalization . PSYTF YTD gains are higher at: -7.850 vs. ACDC (-52.191). ACDC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 344M vs. PSYTF (154M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 69.3M vs. ACDC (26M). PSYTF has less debt than ACDC: PSYTF (15.1M) vs ACDC (1.23B). ACDC has higher revenues than PSYTF: ACDC (2.13B) vs PSYTF (423M).
ACDCPSYTFACDC / PSYTF
Capitalization700M677M103%
EBITDA344M154M223%
Gain YTD-52.191-7.850665%
P/E RatioN/A12.80-
Revenue2.13B423M504%
Total Cash26M69.3M38%
Total Debt1.23B15.1M8,132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACDCPSYTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTIWX14.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% I
NEJCX6.90N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap C
TBDZX21.98N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Z
LFGTX43.98N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R5
BCEMX28.06N/A
N/A
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts

ACDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACDC has been loosely correlated with PUMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACDC jumps, then PUMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACDC
1D Price
Change %
ACDC100%
-4.13%
PUMP - ACDC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
RES - ACDC
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
HAL - ACDC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
OII - ACDC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
LBRT - ACDC
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
More

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
-0.32%
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.13%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
More