Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs FHKIX
ACEAX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKIX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.18
Change-$0.24 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.24M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$48.32
Change-$0.47 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ACEAX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKIX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ACEAX (53.2M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: ACEAX (2.33) vs FHKIX (1.15). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ACEAX (7 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKIX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.26 vs. FHKIX (39.93). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.46 vs. ACEAX (-6.93).
| ACEAX | FHKIX | ACEAX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.90 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.90 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.925 | 26.464 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2M | 1.39B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 1.15 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.26 | 39.93 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 57.12 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.93 | 3.46 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 104.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement