Ad is loading...
ACEAX vs FHKIX
ACEAX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKIX
AB All China Equity A
Price$7.89
Change+$0.13 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.84M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$38.72
Change+$0.41 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
ACEAX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKIX commentary
Jan 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. ACEAX (54.8M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: FHKIX (1.81) vs ACEAX (1.62). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ACEAX (6 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FHKIX (24.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKIX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.50 vs. ACEAX (21.31). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : -2.02 vs. ACEAX (-24.14).
| ACEAX | FHKIX | ACEAX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.621 | 0.363 | -447% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.8M | 1.11B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.81 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.31 | 31.50 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.86 | -6.31 | 394% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.14 | -2.02 | 1,196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers