Ad is loading...
ACEAX vs FHKIX
ACEAX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKIX
AB All China Equity A
Price$8.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.3M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$36.81
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
ACEAX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKIX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. ACEAX (45.3M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: ACEAX (2.72) vs FHKIX (1.38). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ACEAX (7 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). ACEAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKIX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). FHKIX (13.26) and ACEAX (12.92) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.27 vs. ACEAX (-12.56).
| ACEAX | FHKIX | ACEAX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.90 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.90 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.873 | -4.588 | -19% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.3M | 1.18B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 1.38 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.92 | 13.26 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.31 | 8.96 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.56 | 2.27 | -554% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers