Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs FHKTX
ACEAX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKTX
AB All China Equity A
Price$11.23
Change+$0.10 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.36M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.33
Change+$1.02 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ACEAX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKTX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Buy and FHKTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ACEAX (55.4M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: ACEAX (2.33) vs FHKTX (0.88). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: ACEAX (7 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). ACEAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FHKTX (4%) vs FHKTX (4%). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKTX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). ACEAX (30.97) and FHKTX (30.20) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 10.49 vs. ACEAX (-1.26).
| ACEAX | FHKTX | ACEAX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.43 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.43 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.536 | 37.477 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 121% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.4M | 1.39B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 0.88 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.97 | 30.20 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.09 | 89.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.26 | 10.49 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement