Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$8.90
Change-$0.13 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.04M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.30
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and MCDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. ACEAX (49M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (3.62) vs ACEAX (2.82). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.13 vs. ACEAX (19.53). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.33 vs. ACEAX (-7.18).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.973 | 12.616 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49M | 93.9M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 3.62 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.53 | 22.13 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.49 | 3.33 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.18 | -3.33 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers