Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$11.23
Change+$0.10 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.36M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. ACEAX (55.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (2.90) vs ACEAX (2.33). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.97 vs. MCDFX (25.26). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.22 vs. ACEAX (-1.26).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.536 | 30.354 | 117% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.4M | 99.4M | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 2.90 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.97 | 25.26 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.09 | 35.95 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.26 | -0.22 | 578% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement