Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$9.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.1M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.07
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. ACEAX (51.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (3.26) vs ACEAX (2.64). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.77 vs. ACEAX (36.22). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.73 vs. ACEAX (-9.73).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.701 | 22.142 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.1M | 90.4M | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 3.26 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.22 | 40.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.09 | 11.00 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.73 | -3.73 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement