Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.88
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.1M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.98
Change-$0.16 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. ACEAX (55.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (2.78) vs ACEAX (2.16). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.81 vs. MCDFX (26.98). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.09 vs. ACEAX (-5.33).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.910 | 30.872 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.1M | 104M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 2.78 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.81 | 26.98 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.45 | 41.30 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.33 | -2.09 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement