Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.18
Change-$0.24 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.24M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.39
Change-$0.22 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. ACEAX (53.2M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (2.90) vs ACEAX (2.33). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.26 vs. MCDFX (44.16). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.03 vs. ACEAX (-6.93).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.925 | 26.291 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2M | 99.4M | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 2.90 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.26 | 44.16 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 21.11 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.93 | -4.03 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement