Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs TRCLX
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs TRCLX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.62
Change-$0.08 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.87M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.67
Change-$0.15 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.48M
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. ACEAX (53.9M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: ACEAX (2.24) vs TRCLX (1.34). ACEAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ACEAX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEAX (1.86). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). ACEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ACEAX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.67 vs. TRCLX (29.34). ACEAX (-10.06) and TRCLX (-10.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ACEAX | TRCLX | ACEAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.03 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.10 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.416 | 29.451 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.9M | 62.5M | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 1.34 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.67 | 29.34 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.94 | 29.11 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.06 | -10.16 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement