Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs TRCLX
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs TRCLX
AB All China Equity A
Price$11.23
Change+$0.10 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.36M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.06
Change+$0.17 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.27M
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 63.3M vs. ACEAX (55.4M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: ACEAX (2.33) vs TRCLX (1.39). ACEAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ACEAX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEAX (1.86). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). ACEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ACEAX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.97 vs. TRCLX (23.87). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.18 vs. ACEAX (-1.26).
| ACEAX | TRCLX | ACEAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.03 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.10 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.536 | 29.735 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.4M | 63.3M | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 1.39 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.97 | 23.87 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.09 | 32.54 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.26 | 1.18 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement