Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs TRCLX
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs TRCLX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.18
Change-$0.24 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.24M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.98
Change-$0.23 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.13M
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 60.1M vs. ACEAX (53.2M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: ACEAX (2.33) vs TRCLX (1.39). ACEAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ACEAX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEAX (1.86). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). ACEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ACEAX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.26 vs. TRCLX (38.51). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.49 vs. ACEAX (-6.93).
| ACEAX | TRCLX | ACEAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.03 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.10 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.925 | 25.095 | 119% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2M | 60.1M | 89% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 1.39 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.26 | 38.51 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 16.85 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.93 | -5.49 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement