Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs TRCLX
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs TRCLX
AB All China Equity A
Price$9.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.1M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX (53M) and ACEAX (51.1M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ACEAX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: ACEAX (2.64) vs TRCLX (1.61). ACEAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ACEAX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEAX (1.86). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). ACEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ACEAX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.22 vs. TRCLX (30.82). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.09 vs. ACEAX (-9.73).
| ACEAX | TRCLX | ACEAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.03 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.10 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.701 | 17.424 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.1M | 53M | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 1.61 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.22 | 30.82 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.09 | 4.27 | 306% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.73 | -2.09 | 465% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement