ACEL
Price
$11.83
Change
+$0.19 (+1.63%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
994.42M
33 days until earnings call
GHIFF
Price
$8.13
Change
+$0.05 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
152.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACEL vs GHIFF

Header iconACEL vs GHIFF Comparison
Open Charts ACEL vs GHIFFBanner chart's image
Accel Entertainment
Price$11.83
Change+$0.19 (+1.63%)
Volume$325.47K
Capitalization994.42M
Gamehost
Price$8.13
Change+$0.05 (+0.62%)
Volume$498
Capitalization152.07M
ACEL vs GHIFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACEL vs. GHIFF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEL is a StrongBuy and GHIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ACEL: $11.83 vs. GHIFF: $8.13)
Brand notoriety: ACEL and GHIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACEL: 97% vs. GHIFF: 181%
Market capitalization -- ACEL: $994.42M vs. GHIFF: $152.07M
ACEL [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $994.42M. GHIFF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $152.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACEL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHIFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACEL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GHIFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHIFF is a better buy in the long-term than ACEL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACEL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ACEL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ACEL (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +4.97% price change this week, while GHIFF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACEL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+2.03% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEL($994M) has a higher market cap than GHIFF($152M). ACEL has higher P/E ratio than GHIFF: ACEL (22.40) vs GHIFF (13.61). GHIFF YTD gains are higher at: 14.831 vs. ACEL (10.768). ACEL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158M vs. GHIFF (26.9M). ACEL has more cash in the bank: 262M vs. GHIFF (16.6M). GHIFF has less debt than ACEL: GHIFF (66.1M) vs ACEL (543M). ACEL has higher revenues than GHIFF: ACEL (1.17B) vs GHIFF (74.6M).
ACELGHIFFACEL / GHIFF
Capitalization994M152M654%
EBITDA158M26.9M587%
Gain YTD10.76814.83173%
P/E Ratio22.4013.61165%
Revenue1.17B74.6M1,568%
Total Cash262M16.6M1,578%
Total Debt543M66.1M821%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACEL vs GHIFF: Fundamental Ratings
ACEL
GHIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1344
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
799
SMR RATING
1..100
4950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2742
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACEL's Valuation (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHIFF (96). This means that ACEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHIFF’s over the last 12 months.

GHIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACEL (79). This means that GHIFF’s stock grew significantly faster than ACEL’s over the last 12 months.

ACEL's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as GHIFF (50). This means that ACEL’s stock grew similarly to GHIFF’s over the last 12 months.

ACEL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GHIFF (49). This means that ACEL’s stock grew similarly to GHIFF’s over the last 12 months.

ACEL's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as GHIFF (42). This means that ACEL’s stock grew similarly to GHIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHIN44.561.55
+3.60%
PHINIA
WNXM.X57.1668600.019634
+0.03%
Wrapped NXM cryptocurrency
SMR38.24-0.42
-1.09%
NuScale Power Corp
BRBR57.26-1.49
-2.54%
BellRing Brands
AST.X0.041997-0.001614
-3.70%
AirSwap cryptocurrency

ACEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACEL has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACEL jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACEL
1D Price
Change %
ACEL100%
+1.63%
CZR - ACEL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
GDEN - ACEL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
BYD - ACEL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
IGT - ACEL
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
MGM - ACEL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
More

GHIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GHIFF and ACEL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHIFF and ACEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHIFF
1D Price
Change %
GHIFF100%
N/A
ACEL - GHIFF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
GEBHY - GHIFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
GMVHF - GHIFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.02%
GEBHF - GHIFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMALF - GHIFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More