Advertisement
ACEL vs GHIFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEL is a Hold and GHIFF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACEL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHIFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ACEL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GHIFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACEL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHIFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACEL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GHIFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
ACEL (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -13.69% price change this week, while GHIFF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACEL is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-2.08% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| ACEL | GHIFF | ACEL / GHIFF | |
| Capitalization | 994M | 152M | 654% |
| EBITDA | 158M | 26.9M | 587% |
| Gain YTD | 3.933 | 34.463 | 11% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.40 | 13.61 | 165% |
| Revenue | 1.17B | 74.6M | 1,568% |
| Total Cash | 262M | 16.6M | 1,578% |
| Total Debt | 543M | 66.1M | 821% |
ACEL | GHIFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACEL's Valuation (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHIFF (97). This means that ACEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHIFF’s over the last 12 months.
GHIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACEL (79). This means that GHIFF’s stock grew significantly faster than ACEL’s over the last 12 months.
ACEL's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GHIFF (49). This means that ACEL’s stock grew similarly to GHIFF’s over the last 12 months.
GHIFF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACEL (79). This means that GHIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACEL’s over the last 12 months.
ACEL's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as GHIFF (29). This means that ACEL’s stock grew similarly to GHIFF’s over the last 12 months.
| ACEL | GHIFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 30% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 31% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 24% |
Advertisement
ACEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACEL has been loosely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACEL jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACEL | 100% | +5.71% | ||
| BYD - ACEL | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| INSE - ACEL | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| GDEN - ACEL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| CZR - ACEL | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| MGM - ACEL | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
GHIFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHIFF and ACEL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHIFF and ACEL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHIFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHIFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACEL - GHIFF | 27% Poorly correlated | +5.71% | ||
| GEBHY - GHIFF | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| GMVHF - GHIFF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| GEBHF - GHIFF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GMALF - GHIFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||