Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWBX
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.30
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.08M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.70
Change+$0.31 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. ACEMX (18.1M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWBX (0.13) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWBX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. ACEMX (10.51). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.24 vs. ACEMX (-0.62).
| ACEMX | RNWBX | ACEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.67 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.562 | 17.879 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 11.99 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.36 | 36.12 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | 18.24 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.20 | 81.10 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement