Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWBX
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.15
Change+$0.10 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.1M
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.59
Change+$0.63 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. ACEMX (19.1M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWBX (0.12) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWBX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.31 vs. ACEMX (11.99). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.94 vs. ACEMX (5.52).
| ACEMX | RNWBX | ACEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.67 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.709 | 24.528 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 13.31 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.49 | 55.50 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.52 | 24.94 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.80 | 87.47 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers