Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWBX
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.68M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. ACEMX (17.7M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWBX (0.13) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWBX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.48 vs. ACEMX (5.82). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.16 vs. ACEMX (6.12).
| ACEMX | RNWBX | ACEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.67 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.933 | 15.337 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 8.48 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.06 | 38.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.12 | 24.16 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.25 | 59.88 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement