Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs HSHCX
ACEYX vs HSHCX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs HSHCX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$9.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.24M
Hartford Schroders China A C
Price$10.53
Change+$0.07 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
ACEYX vs HSHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. HSHCX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Hold and HSHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 50.2M vs. HSHCX (17.3M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than HSHCX: ACEYX (3.27) vs HSHCX (0.00). ACEYX was incepted earlier than HSHCX: ACEYX (7 years) vs HSHCX (5 years). HSHCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than ACEYX (1.60). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. HSHCX (57.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHCX: ACEYX (0) vs HSHCX (2000). ACEYX (23.89) and HSHCX (23.30) have marching annual gain over last year. ACEYX return over 5 years is better than : -9.92 vs. HSHCX (-17.02).
| ACEYX | HSHCX | ACEYX / HSHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 2.25 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 2.84 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.931 | 5.405 | 276% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.2M | 17.3M | 290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.89 | 23.30 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.84 | -21.42 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.92 | -17.02 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement