Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs LNGZX
ACEYX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs LNGZX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$10.14
Change-$0.24 (-2.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52M
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$46.38
Change-$0.75 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.47M
ACEYX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. LNGZX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX (52M) and LNGZX (50.5M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ACEYX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: ACEYX (2.88) vs LNGZX (0.96). ACEYX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: ACEYX (7 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). ACEYX (1.60) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. LNGZX (40.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: ACEYX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). ACEYX (48.72) and LNGZX (47.31) have marching annual gain over last year. ACEYX return over 5 years is better than : -5.66 vs. LNGZX (-34.73).
| ACEYX | LNGZX | ACEYX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.24 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.39 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.238 | 27.828 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52M | 50.5M | 103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 0.96 | 300% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.72 | 47.31 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.74 | 14.96 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.66 | -34.73 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement