Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs LNGZX
ACEYX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs LNGZX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$9.91
Change+$0.08 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.57M
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$45.12
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.29M
ACEYX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. LNGZX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 52.6M vs. LNGZX (49.3M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: ACEYX (3.16) vs LNGZX (1.03). ACEYX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: ACEYX (7 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). ACEYX (1.60) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. LNGZX (40.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: ACEYX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). ACEYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.11 vs. LNGZX (36.94). ACEYX return over 5 years is better than : -8.76 vs. LNGZX (-33.93).
| ACEYX | LNGZX | ACEYX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.24 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.39 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.338 | 22.023 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.6M | 49.3M | 107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 1.03 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.11 | 36.94 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.77 | 7.00 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.76 | -33.93 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement