Ad is loading...
ACEYX vs MCSMX
ACEYX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs MCSMX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$8.61
Change+$0.09 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.62M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$9.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
ACEYX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. MCSMX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and MCSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 65.7M vs. ACEYX (47.6M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: ACEYX (3.56) vs MCSMX (1.31). ACEYX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: ACEYX (7 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). ACEYX (1.60) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.40). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCSMX (54.39). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: ACEYX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). ACEYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.44 vs. MCSMX (3.43). ACEYX return over 5 years is better than : -8.73 vs. MCSMX (-38.87).
| ACEYX | MCSMX | ACEYX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.40 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.40 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.901 | 3.744 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.6M | 65.7M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 1.31 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | 3.43 | 362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.12 | -9.75 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.73 | -38.87 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -7.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...