Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs MICDX
ACEYX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs MICDX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$10.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.77M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.32
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
ACEYX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. MICDX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. ACEYX (55.8M). MICDX (2.99) and ACEYX (2.88) have matching dividends . ACEYX was incepted earlier than MICDX: ACEYX (7 years) vs MICDX (15 years). ACEYX (1.60) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MICDX (75.80). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: ACEYX (0) vs MICDX (100000). ACEYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.22 vs. MICDX (52.10). MICDX return over 5 years is better than : 0.33 vs. ACEYX (-0.28).
| ACEYX | MICDX | ACEYX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.19 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.19 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.637 | 31.410 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.8M | 99.4M | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.99 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.22 | 52.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.82 | 29.88 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.28 | 0.33 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers