Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs MICDX
ACEYX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs MICDX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$8.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.95M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$13.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
ACEYX vs MICDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. MICDX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Hold and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. ACEYX (49M). ACEYX (3.49) and MICDX (3.48) have matching dividends . ACEYX was incepted earlier than MICDX: ACEYX (7 years) vs MICDX (15 years). ACEYX (1.60) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MICDX (75.80). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: ACEYX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.98 vs. ACEYX (17.48). MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -4.55 vs. ACEYX (-6.42).
| ACEYX | MICDX | ACEYX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.19 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.19 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.543 | 11.919 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49M | 93.9M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 3.48 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.48 | 18.98 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.24 | 1.10 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.42 | -4.55 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement