Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs NGCAX
ACEYX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs NGCAX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$10.18
Change+$0.15 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.62M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$41.28
Change+$0.23 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
ACEYX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. NGCAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 54.6M vs. NGCAX (50.8M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: ACEYX (3.16) vs NGCAX (0.93). ACEYX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: ACEYX (7 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) and ACEYX (1.60) have similar cost to investors . ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. NGCAX (40.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: ACEYX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). ACEYX (43.91) and NGCAX (42.76) have marching annual gain over last year. ACEYX return over 5 years is better than : -11.13 vs. NGCAX (-39.73).
| ACEYX | NGCAX | ACEYX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.49 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.64 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.847 | 23.459 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.6M | 50.8M | 107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 0.93 | 339% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.91 | 42.76 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.37 | 6.89 | 339% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.13 | -39.73 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement