ACGBF
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.02 (-2.78%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
347.86B
BACHY
Price
$13.91
Change
+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
230.8B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGBF vs BACHY

Header iconACGBF vs BACHY Comparison
Open Charts ACGBF vs BACHYBanner chart's image
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$0.70
Change-$0.02 (-2.78%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization347.86B
Bank of China
Price$13.91
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Volume$47.61K
Capitalization230.8B
ACGBF vs BACHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BACHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGBF vs. BACHY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBF is a Hold and BACHY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGBF: $0.70 vs. BACHY: $13.91)
Brand notoriety: ACGBF and BACHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGBF: 89% vs. BACHY: 93%
Market capitalization -- ACGBF: $347.86B vs. BACHY: $230.8B
ACGBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $347.86B. BACHY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $230.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBACHY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BACHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBF is a better buy in the long-term than BACHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BACHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BACHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BACHY is a better buy in the short-term than ACGBF.

Price Growth

ACGBF (@Major Banks) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while BACHY (@Major Banks) price change was +1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BACHY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBF($348B) has a higher market cap than BACHY($231B). ACGBF has higher P/E ratio than BACHY: ACGBF (6.69) vs BACHY (5.28). ACGBF YTD gains are higher at: 25.527 vs. BACHY (17.573). BACHY has less debt than ACGBF: BACHY (2.39T) vs ACGBF (3.55T). ACGBF has higher revenues than BACHY: ACGBF (711B) vs BACHY (633B).
ACGBFBACHYACGBF / BACHY
Capitalization348B231B151%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.52717.573145%
P/E Ratio6.695.28127%
Revenue711B633B112%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.55T2.39T148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGBF vs BACHY: Fundamental Ratings
ACGBF
BACHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8853
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
166
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1327
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGBF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (91). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (16). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (1). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (58). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (27). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGBFBACHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
30%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BACHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLRX1.860.23
+14.11%
Pliant Therapeutics
IHG123.221.13
+0.93%
InterContinental Hotels Group Plc
EGBN19.82-0.12
-0.60%
Eagle Bancorp
CVBF20.32-0.13
-0.64%
CVB Financial Corp
KZIA7.76-0.33
-4.08%
Kazia Therapeutics Limited

ACGBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACGBF and ABMRF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACGBF and ABMRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBF
1D Price
Change %
ACGBF100%
-2.61%
ABMRF - ACGBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHY - ACGBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
ACGBY - ACGBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
AGRPF - ACGBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCSO - ACGBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BACHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BACHY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BACHY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHY
1D Price
Change %
BACHY100%
+0.36%
CICHY - BACHY
82%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
IDCBY - BACHY
81%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
ACGBY - BACHY
69%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
BACHF - BACHY
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
SCBFY - BACHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
More