Advertisement
ACGBF vs BACHY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBF is a Hold and BACHY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACGBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBACHY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ACGBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- BACHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACGBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BACHY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACGBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
- BACHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ACGBF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BACHY (@Major Banks) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
BACHY is expected to report earnings on Aug 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (+2.71% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| ACGBF | BACHY | ACGBF / BACHY | |
| Capitalization | 326B | 229B | 142% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.179 | 19.584 | 78% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.17 | 5.41 | 114% |
| Revenue | 711B | 633B | 112% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.55T | 2.39T | 148% |
ACGBF | BACHY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACGBF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (91). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.
BACHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (21). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.
BACHY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (1). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.
ACGBF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (52). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.
ACGBF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (26). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.
| ACGBF | BACHY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 33% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 36% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 29% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 44% | 1 day ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 28% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 31% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 71% |
Advertisement
ACGBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACGBF and ABMRF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACGBF and ABMRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACGBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACGBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ABMRF - ACGBF | 6% Poorly correlated | +10.23% | ||
| BACHY - ACGBF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
| ACGBY - ACGBF | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
| AGRPF - ACGBF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BCSO - ACGBF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
BACHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BACHY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BACHY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BACHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BACHY | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| CICHY - BACHY | 82% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| IDCBY - BACHY | 81% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| ACGBY - BACHY | 69% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| BACHF - BACHY | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCBFY - BACHY | 24% Poorly correlated | -7.31% | ||
More | ||||