ACGBY
Price
$16.55
Change
-$0.07 (-0.42%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
319.48B
AGRPF
Price
$8.11
Change
-$0.32 (-3.80%)
Updated
May 31 closing price
Capitalization
9.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGBY vs AGRPF

Header iconACGBY vs AGRPF Comparison
Open Charts ACGBY vs AGRPFBanner chart's image
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$16.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.42%)
Volume$37.26K
Capitalization319.48B
Absa Group
Price$8.11
Change-$0.32 (-3.80%)
Volume$176
Capitalization9.05B
ACGBY vs AGRPF Comparison Chart in %
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGBY vs. AGRPF commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBY is a Hold and AGRPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGBY: $16.55 vs. AGRPF: $8.11)
Brand notoriety: ACGBY and AGRPF are both not notable
ACGBY represents the Major Banks, while AGRPF is part of the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGBY: 87% vs. AGRPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ACGBY: $319.57B vs. AGRPF: $8.78B
ACGBY [@Major Banks] is valued at $319.57B. AGRPF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $845.69B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $132.93B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGBY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileAGRPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • AGRPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the long-term than AGRPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ACGBY (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while AGRPF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.57%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.69% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBY($319B) has a higher market cap than AGRPF($9.05B). AGRPF (6.30) and ACGBY (6.28) have similar P/E ratio . ACGBY YTD gains are higher at: 25.635 vs. AGRPF (0.000). AGRPF has less debt than ACGBY: AGRPF (214B) vs ACGBY (3.47T). ACGBY has higher revenues than AGRPF: ACGBY (713B) vs AGRPF (113B).
ACGBYAGRPFACGBY / AGRPF
Capitalization319B9.05B3,524%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.6350.000-
P/E Ratio6.286.30100%
Revenue713B113B631%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.47T214B1,622%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGBY vs AGRPF: Fundamental Ratings
ACGBY
AGRPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5741
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5172
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2347
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5028

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGRPF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACGBY (65). This means that AGRPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGRPF (100). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew significantly faster than AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPF (1). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPF (72). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPF (47). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGBYAGRPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADN3.410.07
+2.10%
Advent Technologies Holdings Inc.
HQI9.340.12
+1.30%
HireQuest
SSNC87.890.41
+0.47%
SS&C Technologies Holdings
MPB28.830.03
+0.10%
Mid Penn Bancorp
KGS34.44-0.10
-0.29%
Kodiak Gas Services

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
-0.40%
IDCBY - ACGBY
77%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
CICHY - ACGBY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
BACHY - ACGBY
69%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
AAVMY - ACGBY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
More

AGRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGRPF and ACGBY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGRPF and ACGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGRPF
1D Price
Change %
AGRPF100%
N/A
ACGBY - AGRPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
BACHY - AGRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
ABMRF - AGRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
ACGBF - AGRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCMXY - AGRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More