ACGBY
Price
$14.21
Change
-$0.53 (-3.59%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
173.61B
BBVXF
Price
$14.45
Change
-$0.12 (-0.82%)
Updated
Mar 25 closing price
Capitalization
46.03B
Ad is loading...

ACGBY vs BBVXF

Header iconACGBY vs BBVXF Comparison
Open Charts ACGBY vs BBVXFBanner chart's image
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$14.21
Change-$0.53 (-3.59%)
Volume$64.88K
Capitalization173.61B
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A
Price$14.45
Change-$0.12 (-0.82%)
Volume$606
Capitalization46.03B
ACGBY vs BBVXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGBY vs. BBVXF commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBY is a Hold and BBVXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGBY: $14.22 vs. BBVXF: $14.45)
Brand notoriety: ACGBY and BBVXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGBY: 256% vs. BBVXF: 2%
Market capitalization -- ACGBY: $173.61B vs. BBVXF: $46.03B
ACGBY [@Major Banks] is valued at $173.61B. BBVXF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $46.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGBY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileBBVXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • BBVXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the long-term than BBVXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGBY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ACGBY (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.21% price change this week, while BBVXF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +57.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +57.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+57.67% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBY($174B) has a higher market cap than BBVXF($46B). BBVXF has higher P/E ratio than ACGBY: BBVXF (6.25) vs ACGBY (3.61). BBVXF YTD gains are higher at: 47.940 vs. ACGBY (5.240). ACGBY has higher revenues than BBVXF: ACGBY (729B) vs BBVXF (31.1B).
ACGBYBBVXFACGBY / BBVXF
Capitalization174B46B378%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.24047.94011%
P/E Ratio3.616.2558%
Revenue729B31.1B2,344%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A68.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGBY vs BBVXF: Fundamental Ratings
ACGBY
BBVXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7432
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGBY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBVXF (72). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBVXF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BBVXF (5). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to BBVXF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BBVXF (2). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to BBVXF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (43). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBVXF (49). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBVXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUSIX11.73-0.27
-2.25%
Cullen Small Cap Value I
KCRIX7.64-0.35
-4.38%
Knights of Columbus Real Estt I
WSCGX27.89-1.54
-5.23%
Allspring Small Company Growth Inst
JLCYX60.14-3.57
-5.60%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R2
CGRIX57.06-3.39
-5.61%
Calamos Growth I

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
-3.63%
IDCBY - ACGBY
77%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
CICHY - ACGBY
74%
Closely correlated
-4.31%
BACHY - ACGBY
69%
Closely correlated
-4.63%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
-9.89%
AAVMY - ACGBY
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.77%
More

BBVXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBVXF and MBFJF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBVXF and MBFJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBVXF
1D Price
Change %
BBVXF100%
N/A
MBFJF - BBVXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.65%
BACHF - BBVXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
BACHY - BBVXF
12%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
BCLYF - BBVXF
8%
Poorly correlated
-8.26%
ACGBY - BBVXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
More