ACGBY
Price
$16.40
Change
-$0.25 (-1.50%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
316.96B
CICHF
Price
$0.94
Change
-$0.04 (-4.08%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
251.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGBY vs CICHF

Header iconACGBY vs CICHF Comparison
Open Charts ACGBY vs CICHFBanner chart's image
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$16.40
Change-$0.25 (-1.50%)
Volume$52.16K
Capitalization316.96B
China Construction Bank
Price$0.94
Change-$0.04 (-4.08%)
Volume$9.85K
Capitalization251.71B
ACGBY vs CICHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CICHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGBY vs. CICHF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBY is a Hold and CICHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGBY: $16.40 vs. CICHF: $0.94)
Brand notoriety: ACGBY and CICHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGBY: 130% vs. CICHF: 20%
Market capitalization -- ACGBY: $316.96B vs. CICHF: $251.71B
ACGBY [@Major Banks] is valued at $316.96B. CICHF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $251.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $861.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGBY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCICHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CICHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the long-term than CICHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CICHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CICHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the short-term than CICHF.

Price Growth

ACGBY (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.60% price change this week, while CICHF (@Major Banks) price change was -6.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.07% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBY($317B) has a higher market cap than CICHF($252B). ACGBY has higher P/E ratio than CICHF: ACGBY (6.22) vs CICHF (5.14). ACGBY YTD gains are higher at: 24.496 vs. CICHF (9.302). CICHF (3.43T) and ACGBY (3.47T) have identical debt. CICHF has higher revenues than ACGBY: CICHF (758B) vs ACGBY (713B).
ACGBYCICHFACGBY / CICHF
Capitalization317B252B126%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.4969.302263%
P/E Ratio6.225.14121%
Revenue713B758B94%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.47T3.43T101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGBY vs CICHF: Fundamental Ratings
ACGBY
CICHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5770
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
770
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGBY's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (79). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CICHF (70). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (1). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (54). This means that CICHF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (24). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGBYCICHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CICHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIC14.300.38
+2.73%
Acuren Corp
SPFI39.100.25
+0.64%
South Plains Financial
STLD136.09-0.28
-0.21%
Steel Dynamics
KEQU43.48-0.37
-0.84%
Kewaunee Scientific Corp
TNON1.16-0.03
-2.52%
Tenon Medical Inc

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
-1.50%
IDCBY - ACGBY
77%
Closely correlated
-2.22%
CICHY - ACGBY
74%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
BACHY - ACGBY
69%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.50%
AAVMY - ACGBY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More

CICHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICHF and CICHY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICHF and CICHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICHF
1D Price
Change %
CICHF100%
-4.50%
CICHY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
BACHY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
IDCBY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
ACGBY - CICHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
HBCYF - CICHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
More