ACGBY vs CICHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBY is a StrongBuy and CICHF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACGBY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCICHF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ACGBY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- CICHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACGBY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CICHF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACGBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CICHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACGBY (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while CICHF (@Major Banks) price change was +2.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.01%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (-1.71% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| ACGBY | CICHF | ACGBY / CICHF | |
| Capitalization | 174B | 148B | 118% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 50.559 | 35.368 | 143% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.61 | 3.16 | 114% |
| Revenue | 729B | 823B | 89% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 2.12T | - |
ACGBY | CICHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CICHF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (11). This means that CICHF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.
ACGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CICHF (100). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew significantly faster than CICHF’s over the last 12 months.
ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (1). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.
ACGBY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (45). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.
CICHF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (30). This means that CICHF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.
| ACGBY | CICHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 46% | 23 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 48% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KOKU | 104.83 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | |||
| XBJL | 34.33 | -0.04 | -0.12% |
| Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jul | |||
| IGF | 52.19 | -0.15 | -0.29% |
| iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
| MLPR | 59.50 | -0.74 | -1.23% |
| ETRACS Qrtly Py 1.5X Lvgd Aln MLP ETN | |||
| FXP | 17.98 | -0.57 | -3.06% |
| ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | |||
ACGBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACGBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACGBY | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| IDCBY - ACGBY | 77% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| CICHY - ACGBY | 74% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| BACHY - ACGBY | 69% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CICHF - ACGBY | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.57% | ||
| AAVMY - ACGBY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
CICHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CICHF and CICHY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICHF and CICHY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CICHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CICHF | 100% | +4.57% | ||
| CICHY - CICHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| BACHY - CICHF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| IDCBY - CICHF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ACGBY - CICHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| HBCYF - CICHF | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.93% | ||
More | ||||