Advertisement
ACGL vs AVO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGL is a StrongBuy and AVO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACGL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileAVO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACGL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- AVO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACGL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AVO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACGL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- AVO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ACGL (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +4.63% price change this week, while AVO (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.46%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACGL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
AVO is expected to report earnings on Sep 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.35% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
@Food Distributors (-2.52% weekly)Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
| ACGL | AVO | ACGL / AVO | |
| Capitalization | 34.3B | 878M | 3,907% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 105M | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.552 | -13.431 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.50 | 23.92 | 40% |
| Revenue | 18.6B | 1.39B | 1,335% |
| Total Cash | 10.3B | 36.7M | 28,065% |
| Total Debt | 2.73B | 247M | 1,104% |
ACGL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ACGL | AVO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 8 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 27 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MAYT | 35.51 | 0.11 | +0.32% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 May ETF | |||
| IBDT | 25.44 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF | |||
| NGELF | 0.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Nge Cap Ltd. | |||
| DFSE | 39.36 | -0.34 | -0.86% |
| Dimensional Emerging Mrkts Sstby Cr 1ETF | |||
| KORU | 77.08 | -4.43 | -5.43% |
| Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X ETF | |||
ACGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGL has been closely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGL jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACGL | 100% | +1.65% | ||
| ORI - ACGL | 73% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| AIG - ACGL | 68% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| HIG - ACGL | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| FIHL - ACGL | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| IGIC - ACGL | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||