ACGL
Price
$94.41
Change
-$0.51 (-0.54%)
Updated
Jun 25, 03:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.16B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HIG
Price
$130.41
Change
-$1.91 (-1.44%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
36.27B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGL vs HIG

ACGL vs HIG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) vs. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • HIG has outperformed ACGL in recent market activity, with year-to-date gains of approximately 2% compared to ACGL's flat performance.
  • ACGL trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 8.29 versus HIG's 9.46, suggesting a relatively cheaper valuation on earnings.
  • HIG offers a forward dividend yield of about 1.79%, providing income stability absent in ACGL's recent profile.
  • Both stocks have similar market capitalizations around $35 billion, operating in the property-casualty insurance sector amid rising costs and competitive pressures.
  • Recent earnings show HIG with revenue growth and net income up 36% year-over-year despite an EPS miss, while ACGL anticipates strong quarterly results.
  • Tickeron AI signals are mixed for both, but HIG exhibits stronger momentum in recent 30-day gains.

Introduction

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) are prominent players in the property-casualty insurance sector, offering exposure to underwriting, investments, and risk management. This comparison analyzes their recent performance, valuations, and market positioning amid fluctuating interest rates and catastrophe risks. Investors seeking diversified insurance holdings or traders monitoring sector momentum will find insights into relative strengths, such as growth trajectories and sentiment drivers, to inform portfolio decisions in the current environment.

ACGL Overview and Recent Performance

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL), a Bermuda-based specialty insurer and reinsurer, focuses on high-margin lines like property, casualty, and mortgage. In recent weeks, its stock has traded around $96, within a 52-week range of $82 to $103, reflecting modest year-to-date gains of 0.28% and 4.44% over one year. Performance has been mixed, with dips amid broader market upticks and gains during dips, influenced by anticipation of strong Q1 earnings featuring projected revenue growth from improved underwriting and net premiums earned. Analyst targets average $109, with neutral to buy ratings, though recent price target adjustments reflect caution on expenses. Sentiment is buoyed by technical signals like a bullish MACD crossover and Aroon uptrend, tempered by a move below the 50-day moving average.

HIG Overview and Recent Performance

The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG), a U.S.-based diversified insurer, provides personal, commercial, and group benefits coverage with emphasis on property-casualty lines. Recently, shares hovered near $134, in a 52-week range of $119 to $145, delivering year-to-date returns of 2.01% and 14.64% annually. In recent market activity, the stock rose over 6% in the prior 30 days before a post-earnings pullback, driven by Q1 results showing $7.23 billion in revenue and 36% year-over-year net income growth to $866 million, offset by an EPS miss due to elevated costs and competition. Pricing discipline and technology investments supported core earnings. Analysts maintain overweight ratings with targets around $150, while technicals show a bullish 10-day MA crossover but recent MACD negativity.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across various strategies. Only 25 elite bots out of 351 total earn a spot in this section, selected for their suitability to current market conditions like volatility in insurance stocks. These bots employ diverse approaches—trend-following, mean reversion, momentum—with performance stats including win rates often above 60%, profit factors exceeding 1.5, and controlled drawdowns under 20%, across short-term day trades to longer swings. Neither ACGL nor HIG is explicitly highlighted, but similar sector bots demonstrate strong risk-adjusted returns. Explore these tools to automate trades aligned with real-time AI insights.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ACGL emphasizes global specialty and reinsurance with higher return on invested capital (ROIC) around 5.1%, contrasting HIG's broader U.S. personal and commercial focus with 4.6% ROIC. Growth drivers differ: ACGL benefits from premium rate hikes in niche areas, while HIG leverages investment income and group benefits stability. Recent momentum favors HIG with superior one-year returns and dividend support, versus ACGL's flatter trajectory ahead of earnings. Risk factors include catastrophe losses for both, but ACGL's Bermuda structure offers tax efficiency at the cost of regulatory scrutiny; HIG faces U.S. competition intensity. Sector exposure overlaps in property-casualty, yet market sentiment tilts toward HIG's reported resilience amid cost pressures, with ACGL poised for potential catalysts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward HIG with higher probability due to consistent recent upward trends, stronger year-to-date and one-year performance, and dividend backing, despite mixed technicals. ACGL shows promise from valuation and upcoming earnings but lags in momentum stability. Observable factors like HIG's 30-day gains and positive pattern odds position it favorably in probabilistic terms for the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ACGL vs. HIG commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGL is a Buy and HIG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2026
Stock price -- (ACGL: $94.92 vs. HIG: $132.32)
Brand notoriety: ACGL and HIG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGL: 82% vs. HIG: 108%
Market capitalization -- ACGL: $33.16B vs. HIG: $36.27B
ACGL [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $33.16B. HIG’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $36.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $18.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the long-term than ACGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HIG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the short-term than ACGL.

Price Growth

ACGL (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +2.76% price change this week, while HIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACGL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

HIG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.37% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIG($36.3B) has a higher market cap than ACGL($33.2B). HIG has higher P/E ratio than ACGL: HIG (9.11) vs ACGL (7.08). ACGL YTD gains are higher at: -1.043 vs. HIG (-3.109). HIG has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. ACGL (12.2B). ACGL has less debt than HIG: ACGL (2.73B) vs HIG (4.37B). HIG has higher revenues than ACGL: HIG (28.5B) vs ACGL (19.1B).
ACGLHIGACGL / HIG
Capitalization33.2B36.3B91%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.043-3.10934%
P/E Ratio7.089.1178%
Revenue19.1B28.5B67%
Total Cash12.2B21.8B56%
Total Debt2.73B4.37B62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGL vs HIG: Fundamental Ratings
ACGL
HIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6521
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
194
SMR RATING
1..100
4950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7578
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HIG's Valuation (41) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as ACGL (61) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to ACGL’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as ACGL (19) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to ACGL’s over the last 12 months.

ACGL's SMR Rating (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HIG (50) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that ACGL’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.

ACGL's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HIG (58) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that ACGL’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.

ACGL's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HIG (78) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that ACGL’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGLHIG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVST26.040.78
+3.09%
Envista Holdings Corp
CAC53.170.39
+0.74%
Camden National Corp
ACB2.83-0.02
-0.70%
Aurora Cannabis
BFRG0.64-0.02
-2.78%
Bullfrog AI Holdings
ESLT750.90-21.55
-2.79%
Elbit Systems Ltd

ACGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGL has been closely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGL jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGL
1D Price
Change %
ACGL100%
+1.29%
ORI - ACGL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
HIG - ACGL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
AIG - ACGL
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
PLGO - ACGL
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
GSHD - ACGL
37%
Loosely correlated
+8.41%
More