It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACGL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ACGL (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -3.02% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.05%.
ACGL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
ACGL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACGL | BTAL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago67% | 6 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 10 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago83% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CMNIX | 15.09 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
Calamos Market Neutral Income I | |||
SCHLX | 41.47 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
DWS Health and Wellness S | |||
MLUSX | 11.82 | N/A | N/A |
MassMutual Mid Cap Value R5 | |||
ESERX | 36.89 | -0.16 | -0.43% |
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq R6 | |||
UGLSX | 87.20 | -0.47 | -0.54% |
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGL has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACGL jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACGL | 100% | -0.89% | ||
HIG - ACGL | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
ORI - ACGL | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.85% | ||
AIG - ACGL | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
EQH - ACGL | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
IGIC - ACGL | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTAL has been loosely correlated with MCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTAL jumps, then MCK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL | 100% | +1.25% | ||
MCK - BTAL | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
CBOE - BTAL | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
PGR - BTAL | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
ACGL - BTAL | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
GIS - BTAL | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
More |