ACGP
Price
$35.00
Change
+$1.65 (+4.95%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
703.47M
OWL
Price
$16.27
Change
+$0.22 (+1.37%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.45B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGP vs OWL

Header iconACGP vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts ACGP vs OWLBanner chart's image
Associated Capital Group
Price$35.00
Change+$1.65 (+4.95%)
Volume$3.92K
Capitalization703.47M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$16.27
Change+$0.22 (+1.37%)
Volume$13.06M
Capitalization10.45B
ACGP vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
ACGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGP vs. OWL commentary
Oct 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGP is a Buy and OWL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGP: $35.00 vs. OWL: $16.27)
Brand notoriety: ACGP and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGP: 25% vs. OWL: 151%
Market capitalization -- ACGP: $703.47M vs. OWL: $10.45B
ACGP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $703.47M. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the long-term than ACGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGP is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

ACGP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.66% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -8.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($10.5B) has a higher market cap than ACGP($703M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than ACGP: OWL (145.91) vs ACGP (13.13). ACGP YTD gains are higher at: 2.161 vs. OWL (-27.914). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 804M vs. ACGP (67.5M). ACGP has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. OWL (118M). OWL has higher revenues than ACGP: OWL (2.62B) vs ACGP (11.9M).
ACGPOWLACGP / OWL
Capitalization703M10.5B7%
EBITDA67.5M804M8%
Gain YTD2.161-27.914-8%
P/E Ratio13.13145.919%
Revenue11.9M2.62B0%
Total Cash392M118M332%
Total DebtN/A3.65B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGP: Fundamental Ratings
ACGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGPOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKIE90.600.80
+0.89%
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
MLPB24.85N/A
+0.01%
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLPInfrs ETN SerB
FTHF29.94N/A
N/A
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
LDRI25.44N/A
-0.01%
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF
SPYU55.05-0.14
-0.25%
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN

ACGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGP has been loosely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACGP jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGP
1D Price
Change %
ACGP100%
+4.95%
SEIC - ACGP
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
OWL - ACGP
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
PFG - ACGP
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
BN - ACGP
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
TROW - ACGP
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
More