Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAIH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ACHC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +4.41% price change this week, while AIH (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +14.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.78%.
ACHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.
AIH is expected to report earnings on Jun 27, 2024.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
ACHC | AIH | ACHC / AIH | |
Capitalization | 7.02B | 14.3M | 49,105% |
EBITDA | 189M | -96.8M | -195% |
Gain YTD | -5.633 | -31.845 | 18% |
P/E Ratio | 24.81 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.93B | 651M | 450% |
Total Cash | 100M | 87.9M | 114% |
Total Debt | 1.5B | 319M | 470% |
ACHC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACHC | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CLOX | 25.53 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
Panagram AAA CLO ETF | |||
VONE | 228.99 | -0.97 | -0.42% |
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | |||
GWX | 31.14 | -0.14 | -0.45% |
SPDR® S&P International Small Cap ETF | |||
IDMO | 39.71 | -0.61 | -1.51% |
Invesco S&P International Dev Momt ETF | |||
TSDD | 24.31 | -2.66 | -9.86% |
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACHC has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACHC jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACHC | 100% | +3.08% | ||
UHS - ACHC | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
EHC - ACHC | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
HCA - ACHC | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
SGRY - ACHC | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
CIVI - ACHC | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AIH and LFST have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIH and LFST's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AIH | 100% | +2.62% | ||
LFST - AIH | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
ACHC - AIH | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.08% | ||
CMPS - AIH | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.96% | ||
OPCH - AIH | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
USPH - AIH | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.15% | ||
More |