Advertisement
ACHC vs UHS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACHC is a Hold and UHS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- UHS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACHC (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -9.76% price change this week, while UHS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +4.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
UHS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.28% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| ACHC | UHS | ACHC / UHS | |
| Capitalization | 2.59B | 10.4B | 25% |
| EBITDA | -749.31M | 2.8B | -27% |
| Gain YTD | 96.054 | -18.504 | -519% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.21 | 7.24 | 279% |
| Revenue | 3.37B | 17.8B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 171M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.57B | 5.13B | 50% |
ACHC | UHS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UHS's Valuation (11) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACHC (65) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as ACHC (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's SMR Rating (44) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACHC (99) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
ACHC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as UHS (48) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that ACHC’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
ACHC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for UHS (78) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that ACHC’s stock grew significantly faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.
| ACHC | UHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EZBC | 44.53 | 2.53 | +6.02% |
| Franklin Bitcoin ETF | |||
| DVXY | 22.61 | 0.27 | +1.19% |
| WEBs Consumer Disc XLY Dfnd Vol ETF | |||
| GUSA | 66.04 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US 1000 Eq ETF | |||
| GK | 29.09 | -0.32 | -1.07% |
| AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | |||
| CHIQ | 17.94 | -0.20 | -1.10% |
| Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF | |||
ACHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACHC has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACHC jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACHC | 100% | +3.15% | ||
| UHS - ACHC | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| NHC - ACHC | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
| THC - ACHC | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.00% | ||
| ASTH - ACHC | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
| CON - ACHC | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
UHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been loosely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHS | 100% | +2.54% | ||
| HCA - UHS | 66% Loosely correlated | +5.64% | ||
| THC - UHS | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| CHE - UHS | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| PNTG - UHS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ENSG - UHS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||