It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACIC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ACIC (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while PINXF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.89%.
ACIC is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
ACIC | PINXF | ACIC / PINXF | |
Capitalization | 511M | 34.8B | 1% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 36.364 | -8.670 | -419% |
P/E Ratio | 5.59 | 5.25 | 107% |
Revenue | 287M | 615B | 0% |
Total Cash | 334M | 19.1B | 2% |
Total Debt | 149M | 50.3B | 0% |
ACIC | PINXF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINXF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACIC (83). This means that PINXF’s stock grew significantly faster than ACIC’s over the last 12 months.
ACIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as PINXF (100). This means that ACIC’s stock grew similarly to PINXF’s over the last 12 months.
ACIC's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PINXF (100). This means that ACIC’s stock grew significantly faster than PINXF’s over the last 12 months.
ACIC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PINXF (71). This means that ACIC’s stock grew similarly to PINXF’s over the last 12 months.
ACIC's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PINXF (82). This means that ACIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PINXF’s over the last 12 months.
ACIC | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACIC has been loosely correlated with UVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACIC jumps, then UVE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACIC | 100% | +0.39% | ||
UVE - ACIC | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
DGICA - ACIC | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
STC - ACIC | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
GLRE - ACIC | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
HCI - ACIC | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINXF has been loosely correlated with SCRYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINXF jumps, then SCRYY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PINXF | 100% | N/A | ||
SCRYY - PINXF | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
LNDAF - PINXF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TILCF - PINXF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SZCRF - PINXF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACIC - PINXF | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
More |