It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACKDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAEOXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACKDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AEOXF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACKDF (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +12.79% price change this week, while AEOXF (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.95%.
The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
ACKDF | AEOXF | ACKDF / AEOXF | |
Capitalization | 7.89B | 12.7B | 62% |
EBITDA | 827M | 1.47B | 56% |
Gain YTD | -5.825 | 18.035 | -32% |
P/E Ratio | 32.11 | 128.67 | 25% |
Revenue | 929M | 6.43B | 14% |
Total Cash | 568M | 1.8B | 32% |
Total Debt | 2.49B | 10B | 25% |
ACKDF | AEOXF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 44 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEOXF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ACKDF (100). This means that AEOXF’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
AEOXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ACKDF (86). This means that AEOXF’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
ACKDF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as AEOXF (95). This means that ACKDF’s stock grew similarly to AEOXF’s over the last 12 months.
AEOXF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as ACKDF (50). This means that AEOXF’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
AEOXF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (100). This means that AEOXF’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
ACKDF | AEOXF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago46% | 1 day ago48% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago42% | 1 day ago45% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago43% | 1 day ago49% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago47% | 10 days ago54% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago65% | 24 days ago42% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago51% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
HOOG | 127.27 | 9.54 | +8.10% |
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | |||
SKRE | 10.10 | 0.11 | +1.11% |
Tuttle Cptl Dl 2X Invrs Rgnl Banks ETF | |||
TOLL | 34.67 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
Tema Durable Quality ETF | |||
UBND | 22.09 | N/A | N/A |
VictoryShares Core Plus Intmdt Bond ETF | |||
IBMR | 25.46 | N/A | N/A |
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACKDF and UZAPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACKDF and UZAPF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACKDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACKDF | 100% | N/A | ||
UZAPF - ACKDF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AEOXF - ACKDF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
OMAB - ACKDF | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
PAC - ACKDF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
SRTA - ACKDF | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.50% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEOXF and SKAS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEOXF and SKAS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEOXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEOXF | 100% | N/A | ||
SKAS - AEOXF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACKDF - AEOXF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
OMAB - AEOXF | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
ASR - AEOXF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.76% | ||
CAAP - AEOXF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
More |