Advertisement
ACMLF vs CRWRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMLF is a Hold and CRWRF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACMLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCRWRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACMLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CRWRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACMLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRWRF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACMLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- CRWRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
ACMLF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CRWRF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.40%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-2.80% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| ACMLF | CRWRF | ACMLF / CRWRF | |
| Capitalization | 167M | 1.13B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 21.9M | 57.6M | 38% |
| Gain YTD | -22.615 | 15.360 | -147% |
| P/E Ratio | 50.09 | 58.10 | 86% |
| Revenue | 285M | 198M | 144% |
| Total Cash | 29.5M | 72.2M | 41% |
| Total Debt | 5M | 35.9M | 14% |
ACMLF | CRWRF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACMLF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWRF (69). This means that ACMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWRF’s over the last 12 months.
CRWRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACMLF (100). This means that CRWRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACMLF’s over the last 12 months.
CRWRF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as ACMLF (87). This means that CRWRF’s stock grew similarly to ACMLF’s over the last 12 months.
ACMLF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CRWRF (50). This means that ACMLF’s stock grew similarly to CRWRF’s over the last 12 months.
ACMLF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWRF (74). This means that ACMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWRF’s over the last 12 months.
| ACMLF | CRWRF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 40% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 27% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 28% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 8% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
ACMLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMLF and NEXPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMLF and NEXPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACMLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NEXPF - ACMLF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NMYSF - ACMLF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ALAR - ACMLF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| SPT - ACMLF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
| CRWRF - ACMLF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CRWRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWRF has been loosely correlated with SFSVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRWRF jumps, then SFSVF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SFSVF - CRWRF | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AELTF - CRWRF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XBP - CRWRF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| SRCO - CRWRF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| ACMLF - CRWRF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||