Advertisement
ACMLF vs NEXPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMLF is a Hold and NEXPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACMLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNEXPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACMLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NEXPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
ACMLF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NEXPF (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.51%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.22% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Computer Communications (+2.22% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| ACMLF | NEXPF | ACMLF / NEXPF | |
| Capitalization | 191M | 7.39B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 29.3M | 1.61B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -35.385 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 34.41 | 36.88 | 93% |
| Revenue | 289M | 6.01B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 21.5M | 475M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 5M | 11.6B | 0% |
| ACMLF | NEXPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 15% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 8% | 2 days ago 14% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VRIG | 25.15 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grd ETF | |||
| HGLB | 8.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Highland Global Allocation Fund | |||
| OOTO | 18.87 | N/A | N/A |
| Direxion Daily Travel & Vacation Bull 2X Shares | |||
| PXE | 27.96 | -0.12 | -0.41% |
| Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF | |||
| ZVOL | 12.20 | -0.09 | -0.76% |
| 1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | |||
ACMLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMLF and NEXPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMLF and NEXPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACMLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NEXPF - ACMLF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NMYSF - ACMLF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ALAR - ACMLF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SPT - ACMLF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CRWRF - ACMLF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NEXPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEXPF has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NEXPF jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEXPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEXPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SPT - NEXPF | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| OTEX - NEXPF | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| NET - NEXPF | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
| ACMLF - NEXPF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FTNT - NEXPF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.41% | ||
More | ||||