ACMTA
Price
$29.05
Change
-$9.10 (-23.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
22.4M
BZLYF
Price
$10.71
Change
+$0.19 (+1.81%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACMTA vs BZLYF

Header iconACMTA vs BZLYF Comparison
Open Charts ACMTA vs BZLYFBanner chart's image
ACMAT
Price$29.05
Change-$9.10 (-23.85%)
Volume$100
Capitalization22.4M
Beazley
Price$10.71
Change+$0.19 (+1.81%)
Volume$3.15K
Capitalization6.35B
ACMTA vs BZLYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACMTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACMTA vs. BZLYF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTA is a Hold and BZLYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ACMTA: $29.05 vs. BZLYF: $10.70)
Brand notoriety: ACMTA and BZLYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACMTA: 100% vs. BZLYF: 174%
Market capitalization -- ACMTA: $22.4M vs. BZLYF: $6.35B
ACMTA [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $22.4M. BZLYF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $6.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACMTA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBZLYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACMTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BZLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the long-term than ACMTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACMTA’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BZLYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACMTA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • BZLYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the short-term than ACMTA.

Price Growth

ACMTA (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -23.85% price change this week, while BZLYF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-1.07% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLYF($6.36B) has a higher market cap than ACMTA($22.4M). ACMTA has higher P/E ratio than BZLYF: ACMTA (66.48) vs BZLYF (7.09). BZLYF YTD gains are higher at: 7.168 vs. ACMTA (0.000).
ACMTABZLYFACMTA / BZLYF
Capitalization22.4M6.36B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0007.168-
P/E Ratio66.487.09938%
RevenueN/A1.16B-
Total CashN/A986M-
Total DebtN/A620M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACMTA vs BZLYF: Fundamental Ratings
ACMTA
BZLYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
975
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8524
SMR RATING
1..100
651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5532

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZLYF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ACMTA (88). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACMTA (85). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

ACMTA's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZLYF (51). This means that ACMTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

ACMTA's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (64). This means that ACMTA’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACMTA (100). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACMTABZLYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACMTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDMIF3.120.24
+8.19%
FOUNDERS METALS INC.
ABTZY5.30N/A
N/A
Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Inc.
JFIL0.03N/A
N/A
Jubilant Flame International Ltd.
PCLB32.13N/A
N/A
Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc.
HELNF137.99N/A
N/A
HELVETIA PATRIA HLDG.

ACMTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMTA and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMTA and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACMTA
1D Price
Change %
ACMTA100%
-23.85%
BZLYF - ACMTA
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
HIPO - ACMTA
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
JTGPF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMT - ACMTA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BZLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLYF and ACMTA have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLYF and ACMTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLYF
1D Price
Change %
BZLYF100%
+1.90%
ACMTA - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
-23.85%
HIPO - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
TRRSF - BZLYF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
FACO - BZLYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
RYAN - BZLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More