ACMTA
Price
$38.15
Change
+$0.25 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
29.42M
BZLYF
Price
$10.86
Change
+$0.07 (+0.65%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACMTA vs BZLYF

Header iconACMTA vs BZLYF Comparison
Open Charts ACMTA vs BZLYFBanner chart's image
ACMAT
Price$38.15
Change+$0.25 (+0.66%)
Volume$100
Capitalization29.42M
Beazley
Price$10.86
Change+$0.07 (+0.65%)
Volume$840
Capitalization6.4B
ACMTA vs BZLYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACMTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACMTA vs. BZLYF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTA is a Buy and BZLYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ACMTA: $38.15 vs. BZLYF: $10.85)
Brand notoriety: ACMTA and BZLYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACMTA: 100% vs. BZLYF: 17%
Market capitalization -- ACMTA: $29.42M vs. BZLYF: $6.4B
ACMTA [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $29.42M. BZLYF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $6.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACMTA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBZLYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACMTA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BZLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACMTA is a better buy in the long-term than BZLYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACMTA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BZLYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACMTA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • BZLYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACMTA is a better buy in the short-term than BZLYF.

Price Growth

ACMTA (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BZLYF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -12.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+0.87% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLYF($6.4B) has a higher market cap than ACMTA($29.4M). ACMTA has higher P/E ratio than BZLYF: ACMTA (66.48) vs BZLYF (7.19). ACMTA YTD gains are higher at: 31.325 vs. BZLYF (8.670).
ACMTABZLYFACMTA / BZLYF
Capitalization29.4M6.4B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.3258.670361%
P/E Ratio66.487.19925%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACMTA vs BZLYF: Fundamental Ratings
ACMTA
BZLYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
452
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3218
SMR RATING
1..100
687
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZLYF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ACMTA (88). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as ACMTA (32). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

ACMTA's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BZLYF (87). This means that ACMTA’s stock grew significantly faster than BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

ACMTA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (61). This means that ACMTA’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACMTA (100). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACMTABZLYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACMTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNYYF0.920.01
+0.97%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co.
CDIX1.50N/A
N/A
Cardiff Lexington Corporation
EFGSF135.45N/A
N/A
Eiffage SA
SGIC0.08N/A
N/A
Strategic Rlty Tr Inc.
MTMV1.10N/A
N/A
MOTOMOVA INC.

ACMTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMTA and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMTA and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACMTA
1D Price
Change %
ACMTA100%
N/A
BZLYF - ACMTA
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
HIPO - ACMTA
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
JTGPF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMT - ACMTA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BZLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLYF and ACMTA have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLYF and ACMTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLYF
1D Price
Change %
BZLYF100%
+0.66%
ACMTA - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
TRRSF - BZLYF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
FACO - BZLYF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYAN - BZLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More