ACMTA vs JTGPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTA is a Buy and JTGPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACMTA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJTGPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACMTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JTGPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
ACMTA (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JTGPF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACMTA is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Insurance (-2.21% weekly)Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
| ACMTA | JTGPF | ACMTA / JTGPF | |
| Capitalization | 25M | 1.1B | 2% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 66.67 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.36M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 6.14M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 8.57M | N/A | - |
ACMTA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ACMTA | JTGPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | 2 days ago 5% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 2 days ago 5% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YXI | 14.14 | 0.08 | +0.54% |
| ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | |||
| XFIV | 47.80 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg FiveYrTrgDurUSTrsETF | |||
| QULL | 50.90 | N/A | N/A |
| ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN | |||
| NFRA | 54.43 | -0.12 | -0.21% |
| FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF | |||
| HTAB | 19.26 | -0.06 | -0.31% |
| Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | |||
ACMTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMTA and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMTA and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACMTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMTA | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZLYF - ACMTA | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HIPO - ACMTA | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| JTGPF - ACMTA | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LCSHF - ACMTA | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACMT - ACMTA | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
JTGPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JTGPF and TRRSF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JTGPF and TRRSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JTGPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JTGPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TRRSF - JTGPF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| FACO - JTGPF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| HIPO - JTGPF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| ACMTA - JTGPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACMT - JTGPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||