ACMTA
Price
$29.05
Change
-$4.45 (-13.28%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
25.01M
LCSHF
Price
$8.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACMTA vs LCSHF

Header iconACMTA vs LCSHF Comparison
Open Charts ACMTA vs LCSHFBanner chart's image
ACMAT
Price$29.05
Change-$4.45 (-13.28%)
Volume$300
Capitalization25.01M
Lancashire Holdings
Price$8.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization1.87B
ACMTA vs LCSHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACMTA vs. LCSHF commentary
Jan 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTA is a Buy and LCSHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ACMTA: $29.05 vs. LCSHF: $8.31)
Brand notoriety: ACMTA and LCSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACMTA: 100% vs. LCSHF: 110%
Market capitalization -- ACMTA: $25.01M vs. LCSHF: $1.87B
ACMTA [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $25.01M. LCSHF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACMTA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLCSHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACMTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LCSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LCSHF is a better buy in the long-term than ACMTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LCSHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LCSHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ACMTA (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LCSHF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACMTA is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2024.

LCSHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-2.21% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCSHF($1.87B) has a higher market cap than ACMTA($25M). ACMTA has higher P/E ratio than LCSHF: ACMTA (66.67) vs LCSHF (21.83). ACMTA (0.000) and LCSHF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . ACMTA has less debt than LCSHF: ACMTA (8.57M) vs LCSHF (469M). LCSHF has higher revenues than ACMTA: LCSHF (1.01B) vs ACMTA (3.36M).
ACMTALCSHFACMTA / LCSHF
Capitalization25M1.87B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio66.6721.83305%
Revenue3.36M1.01B0%
Total Cash6.14MN/A-
Total Debt8.57M469M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACMTA vs LCSHF: Fundamental Ratings
ACMTA
LCSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
751
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9970
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LCSHF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACMTA (86). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

LCSHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACMTA (100). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

ACMTA's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LCSHF (51). This means that ACMTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

LCSHF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ACMTA (70). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

LCSHF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as ACMTA (99). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to ACMTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACMTALCSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIJZX52.750.09
+0.17%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret Z
CGWRX69.600.05
+0.07%
Columbia Large Cap Growth R
TSMEX14.73N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq A
DILAX12.73-0.01
-0.08%
Davis International A
CUSRX13.22-0.07
-0.53%
Cullen Small Cap Value Retail

ACMTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMTA and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMTA and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACMTA
1D Price
Change %
ACMTA100%
N/A
BZLYF - ACMTA
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - ACMTA
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
JTGPF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMT - ACMTA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCSHF and RYAN have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCSHF and RYAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCSHF
1D Price
Change %
LCSHF100%
N/A
RYAN - LCSHF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
FACO - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
TRRSF - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
BZLYF - LCSHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMTA - LCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More