ACN
Price
$138.52
Change
+$3.29 (+2.43%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
84.77B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EPAM
Price
$86.38
Change
+$2.49 (+2.97%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.51B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACN vs EPAM

ACN vs EPAM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Accenture (ACN) vs. EPAM Systems (EPAM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Accenture (ACN) operates as a large-scale global consulting and IT services firm with broad diversification across industries, while EPAM Systems (EPAM) specializes in digital engineering and software development for a more concentrated client base.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks experiencing volatility amid AI sector dynamics, with ACN demonstrating resilience through contract wins and share repurchase increases.
  • EPAM has shown stronger year-to-date returns in some periods but trades at lower valuation multiples compared to ACN, highlighting trade-offs between growth potential and stability.
  • Sector exposure for both centers on technology services, though ACN benefits from broader AI integration initiatives while EPAM focuses on engineering solutions.
  • Market sentiment reflects ongoing adjustments to AI-driven changes in IT services, with relative performance influenced by earnings reactions and macroeconomic factors over recent weeks.
  • Observable factors such as trend consistency and positioning suggest probabilistic considerations for investors evaluating these names in a stock comparison context.

Introduction

Accenture (ACN) and EPAM Systems (EPAM) represent two prominent players in the technology services sector, making them relevant for investors and traders seeking to understand relative performance within IT consulting and digital engineering. This stock comparison examines their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning to provide objective insights. Professional investors monitoring sector trends, as well as those evaluating diversification opportunities, may find this analysis useful for assessing how these stocks have behaved amid evolving AI influences and broader market conditions. The focus remains on verifiable developments without forward-looking projections.

ACN Overview and Recent Performance

Accenture (ACN) is a global professional services company offering strategy, consulting, digital, technology, and operations services across multiple industries. In recent weeks, the stock has shown recovery following earlier volatility tied to earnings reports and sector-wide AI discussions. Key developments include announcements of contracts such as a multi-million euro agreement with NATO and collaborations on agentic AI solutions. Share repurchase authorizations were increased for fiscal 2026, signaling management’s view on the company’s financial position. Performance has been influenced by these catalysts alongside broader market sentiment shifts in technology services, with year-to-date returns reflecting resilience relative to some peers.

EPAM Overview and Recent Performance

EPAM Systems (EPAM) provides digital platform engineering and software development services, primarily serving large enterprises and startups with a focus on AI transformation and integrated consulting. Recent market activity has included earnings releases showing revenue growth, though the stock has experienced fluctuations consistent with sector pressures. Analyst actions, such as price target adjustments, have contributed to sentiment. Over recent weeks, the shares have traded within a range influenced by macroeconomic factors and technology sector dynamics, with year-to-date performance highlighting periods of outperformance relative to broader benchmarks in certain intervals.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots designed for various market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest and most suitable for prevailing environments are featured in this Trending section. The platform highlights 25 best AI Trending Bots selected from a total of 351 available options. These bots encompass diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options aligned with individual preferences. The page offers filters by timeframe, asset class, volatility tolerance, and analysis type. For those interested in AI-driven trading tools, explore the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Accenture (ACN) maintains a larger scale with diversified operations across consulting, technology, and operations, providing exposure to a wide client base, whereas EPAM Systems (EPAM) emphasizes specialized digital engineering with potentially higher concentration risk. Growth drivers differ, with ACN leveraging broad AI initiatives and contract expansions, while EPAM centers on engineering solutions for specific transformations. Recent momentum has varied, with ACN showing stability through repurchase programs and EPAM displaying sensitivity to valuation multiples. Risk factors include sector exposure to IT services for both, though ACN’s size may offer relative buffering compared to EPAM’s more focused model. Market sentiment reflects ongoing adjustments in technology consulting amid AI developments, presenting trade-offs between scale and specialization.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative stability amid sector pressures, and positioning in AI-driven services, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward Accenture (ACN) for its demonstrated resilience and diversified catalysts in the context of this stock comparison.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ACN vs. EPAM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACN is a Hold and EPAM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ACN: $138.52 vs. EPAM: $86.38)
Brand notoriety: ACN: Notable vs. EPAM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACN: 62% vs. EPAM: 74%
Market capitalization -- ACN: $84.77B vs. EPAM: $4.51B
ACN [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $84.77B. EPAM’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $4.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $272.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACN is a better buy in the long-term than EPAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EPAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ACN and EPAM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ACN (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +2.36% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was -0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACN is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2026.

EPAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+0.38% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACN($84.8B) has a higher market cap than EPAM($4.51B). EPAM has higher P/E ratio than ACN: EPAM (12.41) vs ACN (11.06). ACN YTD gains are higher at: -47.000 vs. EPAM (-57.839). ACN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.3B vs. EPAM (704M). ACN has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. EPAM (1.04B). EPAM has less debt than ACN: EPAM (288M) vs ACN (8.39B). ACN has higher revenues than EPAM: ACN (73.1B) vs EPAM (5.56B).
ACNEPAMACN / EPAM
Capitalization84.8B4.51B1,879%
EBITDA12.3B704M1,747%
Gain YTD-47.000-57.83981%
P/E Ratio11.0612.4189%
Revenue73.1B5.56B1,316%
Total Cash10.2B1.04B984%
Total Debt8.39B288M2,913%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACN vs EPAM: Fundamental Ratings
ACN
EPAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3969
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6565
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9594
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACN's Valuation (5) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (53). This means that ACN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

ACN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (100). This means that ACN’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

ACN's SMR Rating (39) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (69). This means that ACN’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

ACN's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (65). This means that ACN’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

EPAM's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ACN (95). This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to ACN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACNEPAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EPAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIG5.370.17
+3.27%
Transocean Ltd
MDT83.57-0.30
-0.36%
Medtronic plc
SGRP0.86-0.03
-3.33%
SPAR Group
CDNL64.86-3.28
-4.81%
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc
SES0.70-0.07
-8.98%
SES AI Corp

EPAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPAM
1D Price
Change %
EPAM100%
+2.97%
GLOB - EPAM
75%
Closely correlated
+7.21%
ACN - EPAM
75%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
CTSH - EPAM
71%
Closely correlated
+3.74%
G - EPAM
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.78%
FLYW - EPAM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More