Advertisement
ACN vs EPAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Accenture (ACN) vs. EPAM Systems (EPAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Accenture (ACN) is a global consulting and managed-services giant with roughly $74 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue, dwarfing EPAM Systems (EPAM), a digital engineering specialist generating about $1.4 billion per quarter.
- Both companies are leaning into artificial intelligence (AI), but Accenture reports far larger scale in AI bookings, while EPAM is growing "pure AI" revenue rapidly off a smaller base.
- Accenture's recent stock performance has been stronger and more volatile-to-the-upside, while EPAM shares have faced downward pressure amid softer demand commentary.
- Accenture carries greater financial stability and capital-return capacity; EPAM offers higher exposure to fast-growing AI-native engineering but with more concentrated client risk.
- The two names appeal to different investor profiles: scale and resilience versus higher-beta, specialist growth.
Introduction
Investors comparing ACN and EPAM are essentially weighing two different ways to gain exposure to enterprise technology services and the AI transformation wave. Accenture is a diversified consulting and outsourcing powerhouse serving thousands of the world's largest organizations, while EPAM Systems is a focused digital and software engineering firm known for custom product development. This stock comparison is most relevant to traders and investors evaluating relative performance, market positioning, and how each company converts AI demand into revenue and earnings. Understanding the contrasts in scale, momentum, and risk can help clarify which profile better fits a given portfolio strategy in the current market environment.
ACN Overview and Recent Performance
ACN, Accenture, is one of the world's largest professional services firms, spanning strategy, consulting, technology, and managed services. In recent weeks the company reported fourth-quarter and full-year fiscal 2026 results that reinforced its AI narrative. Quarterly revenue reached roughly $18.7 billion, up 6% year over year, and full-year bookings of about $84.5 billion produced a book-to-bill ratio of 1.2, indicating new business booked ahead of recognized revenue. Accenture also highlighted roughly $11.5 billion in cumulative AI bookings and announced new offerings targeting AI data centers and agentic AI applications, alongside a dividend increase and a multi-year financial framework through fiscal 2029.
Sentiment has improved in recent market activity, with the stock staging a notable rebound over recent months, though it remains below earlier 52-week highs. Analysts generally hold a "Buy" consensus, but price targets sit near or slightly below current levels, reflecting a balanced view of AI opportunity against a measured, single-digit growth outlook for fiscal 2027.
EPAM Overview and Recent Performance
EPAM, EPAM Systems, is a global digital and AI transformation engineering firm serving Forbes Global 2000 clients and high-growth startups. Its most recent quarterly report showed revenue of about $1.4 billion, up 7.6% year over year, with adjusted earnings per share (EPS, or profit allocated to each share) of $2.86. EPAM pointed to accelerating AI-native demand, with "pure AI" revenue exceeding $125 million in the quarter and a strategic partnership with Anthropic to scale applied AI delivery.
However, sentiment has been more cautious than Accenture's in recent weeks. Management lowered its full-year revenue growth outlook to 4% to 6.5%, citing macroeconomic uncertainty, elongated deal cycles, and softness in areas such as travel and consumer clients, particularly in North America. While the company raised its earnings guidance and continues to repurchase shares, the stock has faced downward pressure, and some analysts have trimmed price targets in response to the softer demand commentary.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, but only the most suitable performers for current market conditions earn a place in its curated Trending AI Robots section. These automated systems vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the sets of tickers they follow, so the featured robots are selected to reflect what is working in today's environment rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Traders can review each bot's historical win rate, trade frequency, and drawdown profile to assess fit. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help investors identify AI-driven strategies aligned with their own timeframe and risk tolerance.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most fundamental contrast is scale and diversification. Accenture operates across nearly every major industry and geography, generating annual revenue roughly 13 times EPAM's, which provides broad demand coverage and resilience. EPAM is more concentrated, with meaningful revenue reliance on financial services, software, and North America, making it more sensitive to shifts in client spending.
Growth drivers also differ. Accenture's edge lies in converting enormous enterprise relationships into multi-year transformation and managed-services contracts with recurring characteristics. EPAM's growth case is more tied to AI-native engineering, custom software, and large vendor-consolidation deals, which can scale quickly but carry execution and timing uncertainty.
On momentum, Accenture has shown stronger relative performance recently, aided by solid bookings and investor-day targets, while EPAM has been weighed down by guidance cuts and North American softness. Risk factors for Accenture include pricing pressure and slower discretionary spending; for EPAM, risks center on deal-cycle elongation and geographic concentration. Sector exposure is similar, but Accenture's scale offers a more diversified revenue mix.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would currently lean toward ACN. Accenture demonstrates steadier fundamentals, a more robust bookings pipeline, and improving sentiment, all of which tend to align with favorable trend-based signals. EPAM retains a compelling longer-term AI narrative and a cheaper relative profile, but its recent guidance reductions and softer momentum introduce greater uncertainty. A probabilistic assessment therefore favors Accenture for trend stability and catalyst visibility, while acknowledging that EPAM's higher-beta profile could respond more sharply if its large-deal pipeline converts sooner than expected.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACN is a Hold and EPAM is a Buy.
ACN saw its Stochastic Oscillator recovers from the overbought zone
The Stochastic Oscillator for ACN moved out of overbought territory on November 10, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 57 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 41 of the 57 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 72%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for ACN moved out of overbought territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 38 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 23 of the 38 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 61%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ACN turned negative on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 28 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 56%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ACN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
ACN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +4.16% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ACN advanced for three days, in 184 of 297 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 123 of 201 cases where ACN Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 61%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 3 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. ACN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 71 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.999) is normal, around the industry mean (2.898). P/E Ratio (20.625) is within average values for comparable stocks, (18.492). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.268) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.026) settles around the average of (0.224) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.618) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ACN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
EPAM sees its 50-day moving average cross bullishly above its 200-day moving average
The 50-day moving average for EPAM moved above the 200-day moving average on November 05, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EPAM as a result. In 54 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EPAM just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where EPAM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 23 of 36 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
EPAM moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for EPAM crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
Following a +6.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EPAM advanced for three days, in 199 of 307 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 114 of 176 cases where EPAM Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 65%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EPAM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
EPAM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EPAM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 66 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.336) is normal, around the industry mean (2.898). P/E Ratio (21.528) is within average values for comparable stocks, (18.492). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.575) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.224) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.135) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. EPAM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
ACN | EPAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPAM's Valuation (66) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ACN (71). This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to ACN’s over the last 12 months.
EPAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ACN (100). This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to ACN’s over the last 12 months.
ACN's SMR Rating (38) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (66). This means that ACN’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
ACN's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (35). This means that ACN’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
ACN's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (75). This means that ACN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
| ACN | EPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 10 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while EPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAM’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- EPAM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACN (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was +18.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACN is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2026.
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-0.20% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
Advertisement
ACN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACN has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACN jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACN | 100% | +1.63% | ||
| GLOB - ACN | 76% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| EXLS - ACN | 72% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| G - ACN | 72% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| GIB - ACN | 71% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| INFY - ACN | 70% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||
EPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | +4.67% | ||
| GLOB - EPAM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 69% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 69% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| INFY - EPAM | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| G - EPAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||