ACOPF
Price
$4.77
Change
-$0.48 (-9.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.46B
UTZ
Price
$13.18
Change
-$0.04 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.5B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACOPF vs UTZ

Header iconACOPF vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts ACOPF vs UTZBanner chart's image
A2 Milk
Price$4.77
Change-$0.48 (-9.14%)
Volume$230
Capitalization2.46B
Utz Brands
Price$13.18
Change-$0.04 (-0.30%)
Volume$714.18K
Capitalization1.5B
ACOPF vs UTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACOPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACOPF vs. UTZ commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACOPF is a Hold and UTZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ACOPF: $4.77 vs. UTZ: $13.18)
Brand notoriety: ACOPF and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACOPF: 11% vs. UTZ: 59%
Market capitalization -- ACOPF: $2.46B vs. UTZ: $1.5B
ACOPF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.46B. UTZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACOPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACOPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACOPF is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACOPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACOPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACOPF is a better buy in the short-term than UTZ.

Price Growth

ACOPF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -6.47% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACOPF($2.46B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($1.5B). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than ACOPF: UTZ (81.45) vs ACOPF (30.86). ACOPF YTD gains are higher at: 19.549 vs. UTZ (-15.007). ACOPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 223M vs. UTZ (99.2M). ACOPF has more cash in the bank: 887M vs. UTZ (52M). ACOPF has less debt than UTZ: ACOPF (124M) vs UTZ (985M). ACOPF has higher revenues than UTZ: ACOPF (1.57B) vs UTZ (1.44B).
ACOPFUTZACOPF / UTZ
Capitalization2.46B1.5B164%
EBITDA223M99.2M225%
Gain YTD19.549-15.007-130%
P/E Ratio30.8681.4538%
Revenue1.57B1.44B109%
Total Cash887M52M1,706%
Total Debt124M985M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACOPF vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
ACOPF
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
4384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5178
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UTZ's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPF (57). This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACOPF’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPF (100). This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACOPF’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (84). This means that ACOPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as UTZ (78). This means that ACOPF’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (100). This means that ACOPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACOPFUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACOPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZCRX53.160.50
+0.95%
DWS Small Cap Core R6
ARIDX6.240.03
+0.48%
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value I
MINGX42.180.17
+0.40%
MFS International Intrinsic Value R3
TRRPX17.960.03
+0.17%
Nuveen Real Estate Sec Sel Premier
KMKNX82.020.13
+0.16%
Kinetics Market Opportunities No Load

ACOPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACOPF and ACOPY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACOPF and ACOPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACOPF
1D Price
Change %
ACOPF100%
-9.14%
ACOPY - ACOPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
PAVS - ACOPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
FAMI - ACOPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
AKEJF - ACOPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UTZ - ACOPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
-0.30%
KHC - UTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
FLO - UTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
CPB - UTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
CAG - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
GIS - UTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
More