ACOPF
Price
$5.70
Change
-$0.08 (-1.38%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
UTZ
Price
$13.85
Change
+$0.20 (+1.47%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACOPF vs UTZ

Header iconACOPF vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts ACOPF vs UTZBanner chart's image
A2 Milk
Price$5.70
Change-$0.08 (-1.38%)
Volume$500
Capitalization4.35B
Utz Brands
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
Volume$577.25K
Capitalization1.19B
ACOPF vs UTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACOPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACOPF vs. UTZ commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACOPF is a Hold and UTZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ACOPF: $5.70 vs. UTZ: $13.85)
Brand notoriety: ACOPF and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACOPF: 40% vs. UTZ: 59%
Market capitalization -- ACOPF: $4.35B vs. UTZ: $1.19B
ACOPF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.35B. UTZ’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACOPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACOPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACOPF is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACOPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACOPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UTZ is a better buy in the short-term than ACOPF.

Price Growth

ACOPF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACOPF($4.35B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($1.19B). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than ACOPF: UTZ (65.95) vs ACOPF (34.78). ACOPF YTD gains are higher at: 42.857 vs. UTZ (-10.686). ACOPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 273M vs. UTZ (146M). ACOPF has more cash in the bank: 969M vs. UTZ (54.6M). ACOPF has less debt than UTZ: ACOPF (66.2M) vs UTZ (1.05B). ACOPF has higher revenues than UTZ: ACOPF (1.67B) vs UTZ (1.43B).
ACOPFUTZACOPF / UTZ
Capitalization4.35B1.19B365%
EBITDA273M146M187%
Gain YTD42.857-10.686-401%
P/E Ratio34.7865.9553%
Revenue1.67B1.43B117%
Total Cash969M54.6M1,775%
Total Debt66.2M1.05B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACOPF vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
ACOPF
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9013
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
4988
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UTZ's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPF (56). This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACOPF’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPF (100). This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACOPF’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (88). This means that ACOPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as UTZ (60). This means that ACOPF’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (100). This means that ACOPF’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACOPFUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACOPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPYAX9.11N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq A
CNWDX19.61N/A
N/A
Calamos Evolving World Growth C
RMFEX60.79N/A
N/A
American Funds American Mutual R4
LVOAX18.96N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities A
MNCEX13.00N/A
N/A
Mercer Non-US Core Equity Y3

ACOPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACOPF and ACOPY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACOPF and ACOPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACOPF
1D Price
Change %
ACOPF100%
N/A
ACOPY - ACOPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAVS - ACOPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-11.39%
FAMI - ACOPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
AKEJF - ACOPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UTZ - ACOPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
+1.47%
KHC - UTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
FLO - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
CPB - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
GIS - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
CAG - UTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
More