It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACRFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICHGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACRFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICHGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACRFF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ICHGF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.21%.
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
ACRFF | ICHGF | ACRFF / ICHGF | |
Capitalization | 10B | 12.4B | 81% |
EBITDA | 262M | 815M | 32% |
Gain YTD | 26.553 | 40.378 | 66% |
P/E Ratio | 27.93 | 35.09 | 80% |
Revenue | 3.11B | 3.89B | 80% |
Total Cash | 1.3B | 160M | 811% |
Total Debt | 3.32B | 3.04B | 109% |
ACRFF | ICHGF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACRFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as ICHGF (47). This means that ACRFF’s stock grew similarly to ICHGF’s over the last 12 months.
ICHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACRFF (77). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACRFF’s over the last 12 months.
ICHGF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACRFF (88). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than ACRFF’s over the last 12 months.
ICHGF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ACRFF (46). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew similarly to ACRFF’s over the last 12 months.
ICHGF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as ACRFF (52). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew similarly to ACRFF’s over the last 12 months.
ACRFF | ICHGF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago46% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago42% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago41% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago69% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 3 days ago45% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago47% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACRFF and NHHEF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACRFF and NHHEF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACRFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACRFF | 100% | N/A | ||
NHHEF - ACRFF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HKSHF - ACRFF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACCYY - ACRFF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
ICHGF - ACRFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MNOIY - ACRFF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ICHGF and IHG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICHGF and IHG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICHGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ICHGF | 100% | N/A | ||
IHG - ICHGF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
ACCYY - ICHGF | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
H - ICHGF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.50% | ||
GHG - ICHGF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
MAR - ICHGF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
More |