Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs BLNAX
ACRIX vs BLNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. BLNAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and BLNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. BLNAX (374M). BLNAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: BLNAX (1.69) vs ACRIX (0.55). ACRIX was incepted earlier than BLNAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs BLNAX (8 years). ACRIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than BLNAX (1.10). BLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 273.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). BLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: BLNAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX (-13.58) and BLNAX (-13.65) have marching annual gain over last year. ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.69 vs. BLNAX (15.62).
| ACRIX | BLNAX | ACRIX / BLNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.10 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.10 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.830 | -8.337 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 374M | 309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.69 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.58 | -13.65 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.05 | -4.14 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.69 | 15.62 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...