Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs BLNAX
ACRIX vs BLNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. BLNAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and BLNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.37B vs. BLNAX (428M). BLNAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: BLNAX (1.33) vs ACRIX (0.48). ACRIX was incepted earlier than BLNAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs BLNAX (9 years). ACRIX (1.18) and BLNAX (1.13) have similar cost to investors . BLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). BLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: BLNAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.17 vs. BLNAX (-3.55). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 27.50 vs. BLNAX (20.91).
| ACRIX | BLNAX | ACRIX / BLNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.166 | 9.479 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.37B | 428M | 320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.33 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.17 | -3.55 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.07 | 21.15 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.50 | 20.91 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement