Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs BLNAX
ACRIX vs BLNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. BLNAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and BLNAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. BLNAX (431M). BLNAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: BLNAX (1.50) vs ACRIX (0.50). ACRIX was incepted earlier than BLNAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs BLNAX (9 years). ACRIX (1.18) and BLNAX (1.13) have similar cost to investors . BLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). BLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: BLNAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.92 vs. BLNAX (-1.94). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.81 vs. BLNAX (25.87).
| ACRIX | BLNAX | ACRIX / BLNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | 9.240 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 431M | 329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.50 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.92 | -1.94 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.44 | 23.17 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.81 | 25.87 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement