Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRNX vs FSMAX
ACRNX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ACRNX vs FSMAX
ACRNX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRNX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRNX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. ACRNX (2.74B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ACRNX: FSMAX (0.50) vs ACRNX (0.00). ACRNX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ACRNX (56 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ACRNX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ACRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRNX: FSMAX (0) vs ACRNX (2000). ACRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.46 vs. FSMAX (28.01). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.68 vs. ACRNX (-8.73).
| ACRNX | FSMAX | ACRNX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Fund Existence | 56 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.993 | 17.374 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 42.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.46 | 28.01 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 70.18 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.73 | 35.68 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.47 | 150.44 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers