Ad is loading...
ACUIX vs RMFEX
ACUIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ACUIX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity C
Price$34.86
Change+$0.22 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.34
Change+$0.55 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
ACUIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACUIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACUIX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. ACUIX (1.97B). ACUIX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: ACUIX (1.93) vs RMFEX (1.61). ACUIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ACUIX (25 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ACUIX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). ACUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACUIX: RMFEX (250) vs ACUIX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. ACUIX (-0.84). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 52.96 vs. ACUIX (33.46).
| ACUIX | RMFEX | ACUIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.62 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.62 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.668 | -3.507 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 96.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.61 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.84 | 1.70 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.26 | 8.21 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.46 | 52.96 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.46 | 57.52 | 13% |